: [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used
routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS
> Next thing we know someone is going to start pumping up EIGRP.
>
>> there's an old saying, is-is is deployed in few networks, just some of
>> the world's largest
> Next thing we know someone is going to start pumping up EIGRP.
>
>> there's an old saying, is-is is deployed in few networks, just some of
>> the world's largest ones. there might be a reason for that.
>>
>> personally, i prefer emacs.
idrp please
randy
Next thing we know someone is going to start pumping up EIGRP.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 1:34 PM Randy Bush wrote:
> there's an old saying, is-is is deployed in few networks, just some of
> the world's largest ones. there might be a reason for that.
>
> personally, i prefer emacs.
>
> randy
>
there's an old saying, is-is is deployed in few networks, just some of
the world's largest ones. there might be a reason for that.
personally, i prefer emacs.
randy
I'm personally aware of dozens and dozens of OSPF deployments, but not
aware of a single IS-IS deployment. This is among smaller consumer ISPs,
with typically up to around 10K customers.
I'm sure a big reason for this is that IS-IS support isn't all that common
in the lower end routing gear
In my isp network of ~50,000 subscribers, I run about (200) mpls p/pe nodes in
one ospf area with dual rr cluster for mp-ibgp type mpls overlay services.
seems fine to me.
-Aaron
Q: why do we have to start this debate every other day?
A: because i don't have time to start it every day
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 at 16:18, Steven Bahnsen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> First time poster looking for some input on a debate and I apologise if I've
> done this completely wrong, but I don't think
Why would you want to settle a pointless debate? :)
-mel beckman
> On Jan 25, 2019, at 6:45 AM, Tom Hill wrote:
>
>> On 25/01/2019 04:47, Steven Bahnsen wrote:
>> First time poster looking for some input on a debate
>
>
> This won't settle anything. You've just started the same old debate
>
On 25/01/2019 04:47, Steven Bahnsen wrote:
> First time poster looking for some input on a debate
This won't settle anything. You've just started the same old debate
again, from the beginning. Again. :)
There are almost certainly indexed threads of this mailing list with
enough answers to this
You’re probably right that there a lot more in service devices that are
running OSPF. But IS-IS assuredly is involved in routing way more traffic
volume.
In the end , right tool for the job is all that matters.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 09:17 Steven Bahnsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First time poster
Hi,
First time poster looking for some input on a debate and I apologise if I've
done this completely wrong, but I don't think my colleague will be convinced
until he hears it from this community.
Granted I'm relatively green when it comes to networking, but it was my
understand that other than
11 matches
Mail list logo
