Montgomery, Douglas (Fed):
> Our effort to get our new monitor transitioned to a public facing
> system ran into a wall for ~35 days. Unfortunately during that time,
> the visa of a visiting researcher leading that effort expired.
>
> We have almost recovered from all of that. Unfortunately,
Montgomery, Douglas (Fed):
> Our effort to get our new monitor transitioned to a public facing
> system ran into a wall for ~35 days. Unfortunately during that time,
> the visa of a visiting researcher leading that effort expired.
>
> We have almost recovered from all of that. Unfortunately,
Cc: rpki-monitor , "nanog@nanog.org"
, "Montgomery, Douglas (Fed)"
Subject: Re: [proj-bgp] adding graphs for actually unreachable RPKI
INVALID prefixes to RPKI Monitor?
Message-ID: <2b8f9b07-27a7-08ba-ac51-afd39b30f...@riseup.net>
Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) (2018-09-18):> I also found your analysis very
interesting and useful. Thanks for that.
>
>> What do you think about adding graphs that show the amount of actually
>> unreachable prefixes and IP space? (prefix where no alternative
>> valid/unknown announcement exists)
Michel,
The GoRTR services that cloudflare speaks of below might be an example of an
organization positioned to offer the kind of services you suggest.
https://blog.cloudflare.com/rpki-details/
dougm
--
Doug Montgomery, Manager Internet & Scalable Systems Research @ NIST
On 9/18/18, 4:46
Doug,
> Douglas Montgomery wrote :
> You should follow the discussion of draft-ietf-sidrops-validating-bgp-speaker
> which proposed standardizing an approach to doing
> what you suggest. Many on this thread think that it is a counterproductive
> idea to do this. See discussion starting here:
Michel,
First, thanks for your continued support as a taxpayer.
Second, in general our mission is limited to supporting the development and
promulgation of consensus standards and the development of test / measurement
methods and guidance to accelerate their adoption. In particular we are
Doug,
> Montgomery, Douglas wrote :
> The new monitor has significant additions in the areas of diagnostics, and
> highlights issues of
> interest such as path / customer cone analysis of prefixes that cover invalid
> originations.
Thanks for all the work. More visibility will help. I have
Nusenu,
I also found your analysis very interesting and useful. Thanks for that.
>What do you think about adding graphs that show the amount of actually
>unreachable prefixes and IP space? (prefix where no alternative valid/unknown
>announcement exists)
I am also part of the NIST BGP team.
& Scalable Systems Research @ NIST
From: on behalf of Job Snijders
Date: Monday, September 17, 2018 at 12:23 PM
To: nusenu
Cc: rpki-monitor , "nanog@nanog.org"
Subject: Re: [proj-bgp] adding graphs for actually unreachable RPKI INVALID
prefixes to RPKI Monitor?
On Mon, 17 Sep
10 matches
Mail list logo
