On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> first, awesome, thanks...
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer
> wrote:
>
>> 68.164.80.0/20
>> 68.164.96.0/21
>> 68.164.126.0/23
>> 68.164.160.0/21
>> 68.164.192.0/21
>> 68.164.208.0/23
>>
>> These addr
first, awesome, thanks...
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> 68.164.80.0/20
> 68.164.96.0/21
> 68.164.126.0/23
> 68.164.160.0/21
> 68.164.192.0/21
> 68.164.208.0/23
>
> These addresses have no relationship with Iceland so we can say it's a
> hijacking. But
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 01:54:00PM -0500,
Christopher Morrow wrote
a message of 11 lines which said:
> someone has already parsed out all route announcements from
> ris/routeviews for the 2 specific incidents in question in the
> article? and posted the contents somewhere for review? I didn't
someone has already parsed out all route announcements from
ris/routeviews for the 2 specific incidents in question in the
article? and posted the contents somewhere for review? I didn't see
Renesys do that :( So, they've got some unsupported conclusions that
are tough to get behind absent that dat
Interesting study of what seems to be real BGP shunts:
http://www.renesys.com/2013/11/mitm-internet-hijacking/
5 matches
Mail list logo