On 17 May 2012, at 00:47, Randy Bush wrote:
Could someone make:
2) put the graphs at 'not rpki.net' on rpki.net (too)
no. that is the exact point. the graph to which i pointed is on rob's
site. these are data each relying party can collect and see for
themselves and their point of
Kudos to the RIPE NCC for graciously offering to collect and analyze
repository performance data. And I'm sure that if we ask nicely they
will provide data dumps we can analyze ourselves, just like they do with
RIS and other projects.
Cheers!
Carlos
On 5/17/12 3:31 PM, Arturo Servin wrote:
On
As the global RPKI data set and system load grows, we want to ensure
that the system is performing well. This is why we have added
measurement functionality to the RIPE NCC RPKI Validator toolset:
https://www.ripe.net/certification/rpki-validator-metrics
When enabled, it will gather the
but we're more focused on giving the *user* the tools to measure and
see. so you may want to look at the tables and graphs (graphs more
germane to this discussion) from the rpki.net relying party software at,
for example,
http://www.hactrn.net/opaque/rcynic/index.html
oh, and the docco
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
germane to this discussion) from the rpki.net relying party software at,
for example,
http://www.hactrn.net/opaque/rcynic/index.html
suggestions for improvement solicited, of course.
the text talks about rpki.net
the link is
Could someone make:
2) put the graphs at 'not rpki.net' on rpki.net (too)
no. that is the exact point. the graph to which i pointed is on rob's
site. these are data each relying party can collect and see for
themselves and their point of view in the universe, not some central
authority.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
and sorry that our certs did not pay godzilla or gobble for the
privilege of being in their bowsers. refund below [1]
there was no [1]...
startssl.com - free certs. (that work)
7 matches
Mail list logo
