I've found pinging a polite email to the whois contact on the ASN -
sometimes- gives useful results, but not always.
Be aware that you're not only dealing with router black-holes, but
seemingly some people have applied bogon filtering to their BIND name
servers also.
If you can provide a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2009 8:01 AM, Shane Short wrote:
I've found pinging a polite email to the whois contact on the ASN
-sometimes- gives useful results, but not always.
Be aware that you're not only dealing with router black-holes, but
seemingly some
Hi there,
A customer of mine is reporting that there are a large number of addresses
he can not reach with his addresses in the 109/8 range. This was
declassified as a BOGON and assigned by IANA to RIPE in January 2009.
If you have a manually updated BOGON list, can I please ask that you review
Hi Matthew,
I had the same problem with our new range assigned to us by APNIC, out
of 110/8
You're in for a long, hard and frustrating road.
If you manage to get in contact with anyone, or anyone responds to
you, mind letting me know? I'd suspect they'd probably have us blocked
still
[mailto:matt...@walster.org]
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 7:22 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: 109/8 - not a BOGON
Hi there,
A customer of mine is reporting that there are a large number of
addresses he can not reach with his addresses in the 109/8 range. This
was declassified as a BOGON and assigned
On 09/10/2009 4:22, Matthew Walster matt...@walster.org wrote:
A customer of mine is reporting that there are a large number of addresses
he can not reach with his addresses in the 109/8 range. This was
declassified as a BOGON and assigned by IANA to RIPE in January 2009.
If you have a
6 matches
Mail list logo
