On 6/8/23 04:16, Randy Bush wrote:
thanks aftab
i remember a bit more. the hidden command was there to help debug CEF,
which was new at the time. the CEFlapods wanted a large blob of
prefixes to push the FIB. it kinda pushed the operational FIBs a bit
too far :)
Was this in lieu of flow
On 6/7/23 10:13 PM, Aftab Siddiqui wrote:
I definitely read a detailed research paper about that incident long ago
but can't find any link with any search keywords. But here is the NANOG
archive.
https://archive.nanog.org/mailinglist/mailarchives/old_archive/1997-10/msg00095.html
https://archive
thanks aftab
i remember a bit more. the hidden command was there to help debug CEF,
which was new at the time. the CEFlapods wanted a large blob of
prefixes to push the FIB. it kinda pushed the operational FIBs a bit
too far :)
randy
On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 at 02:15, Randy Bush wrote:
> doug madory is asking me for a cite for the exciting 1997/8 128/9 bgp
> event. my memory as reported to doug is
>
> soon after the 7007 incident, an engineer in a UUNET lab, not
> realizing they were connected to the real internet, used th
doug madory is asking me for a cite for the exciting 1997/8 128/9 bgp
event. my memory as reported to doug is
soon after the 7007 incident, an engineer in a UUNET lab, not
realizing they were connected to the real internet, used the hidden
bgp test command to generate 128/9 chopped in
5 matches
Mail list logo