Re: 2600:: No longer pings

2024-04-14 Thread Randy Bush
> Wonderful news, this has now been fixed :) > Thank you to Cogent for fixing this indee. otoh, i still can not resist https://www.kame.net/ randy

Re: 2600:: No longer pings

2024-04-10 Thread Ben Cartwright-Cox via NANOG
Wonderful news, this has now been fixed :) Thank you to Cogent for fixing this On Sat, 6 Apr 2024 at 11:00, Ben Cartwright-Cox wrote: > > It appears that 2600:: no longer responds to ICMP. > > $ mtr -rwc 1 2600:: > Start: 2024-04-06T10:53:41+0100 > HOST: metropolis

Re: 2600:: No longer pings

2024-04-07 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:12:21PM +0200, Tomáš Holý wrote a message of 227 lines which said: > $ for i in `cat list.txt`; do fping -6 $i -t 500 -r 0; done | grep 'is alive' > 2409:: is alive > 2a09:: is alive > 2a11:: is alive > 2a12:: is alive All of them are public DNS resolvers, which

Re: 2600:: No longer pings

2024-04-07 Thread Tomáš Holý
I'd be just as gutted if they ever pull the plug on ipv6.google.com - it's my go-to "first attempt" for an IPv6 test. :-) But this got me curious, so I grabbed a list of prefixes from [1] and decided to ping them all. Since I went through all that effort, might as well

Re: 2600:: No longer pings

2024-04-07 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 09:33:18AM +0530, Gaurav Kansal via NANOG wrote a message of 41 lines which said: > 2409:: is replying the ICMPv6 request, in case anyone interested Thank, I did not know this service. Note that the signatures on the reverse expired in february: % dig +cd -x 2409::

Re: 2600:: No longer pings

2024-04-06 Thread Gaurav Kansal via NANOG
2409:: is replying the ICMPv6 request, in case anyone interested > On 6 Apr 2024, at 15:31, nanog@nanog.org wrote: > > It appears that 2600:: no longer responds to ICMP. > > $ mtr -rwc 1 2600:: > Start: 2024-04-06T10:53:41+0100 > HOST: metropolis Loss% >

Re: 2600:: No longer pings

2024-04-06 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 06:19:57PM +0800, Soha Jin wrote a message of 50 lines which said: > I don't know what happed to 2600::, but 2a09:: and 2a11:: can be > used as alternatives. These are addresses of https://dns.sb/ running > by xTom. Very good DNS service, buy the way. But, although I

RE: 2600:: No longer pings

2024-04-06 Thread Soha Jin
North American Network Operators' Group > Subject: 2600:: No longer pings > > It appears that 2600:: no longer responds to ICMP. > > $ mtr -rwc 1 2600:: > Start: 2024-04-06T10:53:41+0100 > HOST: metropolis Loss% > 1.|-- lcy02.fla

2600:: No longer pings

2024-04-06 Thread Ben Cartwright-Cox via NANOG
It appears that 2600:: no longer responds to ICMP. $ mtr -rwc 1 2600:: Start: 2024-04-06T10:53:41+0100 HOST: metropolis Loss% 1.|-- lcy02.flat.b621.net 0.0% [...] 6.|-- ldn-b4-link.ip.twelve99.net 0.0% 7.|--