++
On 30Dec2010, at 12.47, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Dec 29, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Josh Smith wrote:
While certainly not the best stuff made I've found the ubiquiti
equipment to be very nice for the price and have a few of their AP's
which have been in service 24x7 for a couple of years now.
Wayne E. Bouchard w...@typo.org writes:
Codes are usually defined in one of two ways... Either cannot be
above the building parapet or cannot be visible from the street
below (which allows you to position a stant at the center of the roof
so you can clear the parapet) but when talking to
On 12/28/2010 11:48 PM, Anonymous List User wrote:
For architectural and building management reasons we cannot mount our
antennas in a rooftop or outdoor location at either end. The distance
between two buildings is 1.5 km, and the fresnel zone is clear. Antennas
need to be located indoors at
On 12/29/2010 8:19 AM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
The third consideration is someone notices and cares.
The Nanostation Loco (again from Ubiquiti) is easily capable of the
distances that you're talking about and is an all-in-out unit (antenna
plus radio, fed with POE) about twice the size of a
+1 on Alvarion.
- Reply message -
From: Bryan Fields br...@bryanfields.net
Date: Wed, Dec 29, 2010 9:30 am
Subject: 5.7/5.8 GHz 802.11n dual polarity MIMO through office building glass,
1.5 km distance
To: nanog@nanog.org
On 12/29/2010 08:19, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
Most
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Bryan Fields br...@bryanfields.net wrote:
On 12/29/2010 08:19, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
Most of these regulations are centered on the concern that your
building not look like a tower site. An antenna that is sufficiently
small that it can not be seen from
On Dec 29, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Josh Smith wrote:
While certainly not the best stuff made I've found the ubiquiti
equipment to be very nice for the price and have a few of their AP's
which have been in service 24x7 for a couple of years now.
Same here.
The price performance is hard
On 12/29/2010 5:47 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Dec 29, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Josh Smith wrote:
While certainly not the best stuff made I've found the ubiquiti
equipment to be very nice for the price and have a few of their AP's
which have been in service 24x7 for a couple of years now.
Same here.
snip
Combine that with the Linux/SDK stuff and you can do some interesting things
with it that you can't do with other devices.
- Jared
Jared,
I don't really have any experience with the Linux/SDK stuff care to
share what you're using it for?
Thanks,
--
Josh Smith
KD8HRX
email/jabber:
For architectural and building management reasons we cannot mount our
antennas in a rooftop or outdoor location at either end. The distance
between two buildings is 1.5 km, and the fresnel zone is clear. Antennas
need to be located indoors at both ends and will be placed on small speaker
stand
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, Anonymous List User wrote:
For architectural and building management reasons we cannot mount our
antennas in a rooftop or outdoor location at either end. The distance
between two buildings is 1.5 km, and the fresnel zone is clear. Antennas
need to be located indoors at
Anonymous List User wrote:
For architectural and building management reasons we cannot mount our
antennas in a rooftop or outdoor location at either end. The distance
between two buildings is 1.5 km, and the fresnel zone is clear. Antennas
need to be located indoors at both ends and will be
On 12/28/10 8:48 PM, Anonymous List User wrote:
For architectural and building management reasons we cannot mount our
antennas in a rooftop or outdoor location at either end. The distance
between two buildings is 1.5 km, and the fresnel zone is clear. Antennas
need to be located indoors at
Codes are usually defined in one of two ways... Either cannot be
above the building parapet or cannot be visible from the street
below (which allows you to position a stant at the center of the roof
so you can clear the parapet) but when talking to building management,
it can very easily be, can't
14 matches
Mail list logo
