On 7/10/12 9:16 AM, John Peach wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:05:36 -0400
shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote:
can some op filter this asshole?
Please stop forwarding the whole message; I'd already dropped him in my
procmail rules.
I don't think the archives need to be archiving it,
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 7/10/12 9:16 AM, John Peach wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:05:36 -0400
shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote:
can some op filter this asshole?
Please stop forwarding the whole message; I'd already dropped him in my
procmail rules.
I don't
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 7/10/12 9:16 AM, John Peach wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:05:36 -0400
shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote:
can some op filter this asshole?
Please stop forwarding the whole message; I'd already dropped him in my
procmail rules.
* Jon Lewis jle...@lewis.org [120710 12:37 -0400]:
Yahoo? Don't hold your breath. The person appears to have been
using the same yahoo account for all the nig nog messages. Why
whoever has admin rights to the mailing list hasn't
removed/banned/filtered nanog...@yahoo.com is a mystery.
We
We were letting people practice their procmail :) They've both been
filtered.
It's situations like this that make me happy I signed up. I just started
with the list this week, and finding out tools for correcting specific tasks
is outstanding. Finding ones that actually WORK is a bonus.
On 10/07/12 9:25 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Whatever admin that's asleep at the wheel needs to wake up. ~Seth
I'm really surprised that people who subscribe to NANOG don't know any
better than to send their complaints TO THE LIST ADDRESS instead of
emailing the ADMIN address. Sheesh - it's
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 11:41:23 -0500, Matt Griswold said:
We were letting people practice their procmail :) They've both been
filtered.
both? I only noticed one source account?
pgpRL8Nw3xaNd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 7/10/2012 9:48 AM, JC Dill wrote:
On 10/07/12 9:25 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Whatever admin that's asleep at the wheel needs to wake up. ~Seth
I'm really surprised that people who subscribe to NANOG don't know any
better than to send their complaints TO THE LIST ADDRESS instead of
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Matt Griswold gr...@dipd.com wrote:
* Jon Lewis jle...@lewis.org [120710 12:37 -0400]:
Yahoo? Don't hold your breath. The person appears to have been
using the same yahoo account for all the nig nog messages. Why
whoever has admin rights to the mailing list
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 1:16 PM, George Herbert
george.herb...@gmail.com wrote:
I mean, really, if you are at provider X and provider X starts
spamming the list, I would think you'd deal with that internally...
it's a tad rough to call what's happening 'spamming', it's surely
'sending
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
the admins of the nanog-list could certainly take action though.
the reason for my email is that it was the second ot type email in a
week and i was hoping someone could clarify what the moderators will
and
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 1:39 PM, shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
the admins of the nanog-list could certainly take action though.
the reason for my email is that it was the second ot type email in a
12 matches
Mail list logo
