Joe Abley wrote:
> On 2010-03-03, at 18:51, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>
>
>> On Mar 3, 2010, at 3:13 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
>>
>>> Are there any common locations in Alaska where multiple local ISPs exchange
>>> traffic, either transit or peering? Or is Seattle the closest exchange
>>> point
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> Or at the cogent website ($4/meg) do the cost justify peering anymore?
Personally I'd rather pay $10 for something that works, than $4 for
something that doesn't
sc...@zaphod:~$ telnet www.cogentco.com 80
Trying 2001:550:1::cc01...
^C
sc..
[snip]
> Does anybody have some numbers they're able to share? In the "two small
ISPs
> in the boonies" scenario, *is* there enough cross traffic to make an
> interconnect worth it? (I'd expect that gaming/IM/email across town to a
friend
> on The Other ISP would dominate here?) Or are both compe
On Mar 4, 2010, at 12:13 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:41:38 CST, Aaron Wendel said:
>> We have very similar issues in Kansas City. A couple years ago we set up a
>> local exchange point but it's had issues gaining traction due to a lack of
>> understanding more tha
On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:41:38 CST, Aaron Wendel said:
> We have very similar issues in Kansas City. A couple years ago we set up a
> local exchange point but it's had issues gaining traction due to a lack of
> understanding more than anything else. In these smaller markets people have
> a hard tim
On Mar 4, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Jay Hanke wrote:
>> From the looks of the link it looks like there is a bit of traction at the
> MadIX. One of the other interested carriers has talked to the University of
> MN and they showed some interest in participating. The trick is getting the
> first couple of
n Donelan'
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Alaska IXP?
On 3/4/10 8:57 AM, "Jay Hanke" wrote:
>>
>> We've seen the same issues in Minnesota. Locally referred to as the
"Chicago
>>. Problem". Adding on to point 3, there is also a lack of neutral
facilities
On 3/4/10 8:57 AM, "Jay Hanke" wrote:
>>
>> We've seen the same issues in Minnesota. Locally referred to as the
"Chicago
>>. Problem". Adding on to point 3, there is also a lack of neutral
facilities
>> with a sufficient amount of traffic to justify the next carrier
connecting.
>> In rural areas
On 2010-03-03, at 18:51, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>
> On Mar 3, 2010, at 3:13 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
>> Are there any common locations in Alaska where multiple local ISPs exchange
>> traffic, either transit or peering? Or is Seattle the closest exchange
>> point for Alaska ISPs?
>
> PCH doesn't
On 3/4/10 8:57 AM, "Jay Hanke" wrote:
>
> We've seen the same issues in Minnesota. Locally referred to as the "Chicago
> Problem". Adding on to point 3, there is also a lack of neutral facilities
> with a sufficient amount of traffic to justify the next carrier connecting.
> In rural areas many
On Mar 4, 2010, at 8:13 AM, Sean Donelan wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Antonio Querubin wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Sean Donelan wrote:
>>
>>> Are there any common locations in Alaska where multiple local ISPs
exchange traffic, either transit or peering? Or is Seattle the closest
exchange point
On Mar 4, 2010, at 8:13 AM, Sean Donelan wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Antonio Querubin wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Sean Donelan wrote:
>>
>>> Are there any common locations in Alaska where multiple local ISPs exchange
>>> traffic, either transit or peering? Or is Seattle the closest exchange
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Antonio Querubin wrote:
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Sean Donelan wrote:
Are there any common locations in Alaska where multiple local ISPs exchange
traffic, either transit or peering? Or is Seattle the closest exchange
point for Alaska ISPs?
peeringdb.com lists only SIX (in Seat
Hello All ,
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Bill Woodcock wrote:
On Mar 3, 2010, at 3:13 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
Are there any common locations in Alaska where multiple local ISPs exchange
traffic, either transit or peering? Or is Seattle the closest exchange point
for Alaska ISPs?
PCH doesn't
On Mar 3, 2010, at 3:13 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
> Are there any common locations in Alaska where multiple local ISPs exchange
> traffic, either transit or peering? Or is Seattle the closest exchange point
> for Alaska ISPs?
PCH doesn't know of any. If any exist, we'd very much like to hear ab
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Sean Donelan wrote:
Are there any common locations in Alaska where multiple local ISPs exchange
traffic, either transit or peering? Or is Seattle the closest exchange point
for Alaska ISPs?
peeringdb.com lists only SIX (in Seattle) and PAIX Seattle.
Antonio Querubin
808-
Are there any common locations in Alaska where multiple local ISPs
exchange traffic, either transit or peering? Or is Seattle the closest
exchange point for Alaska ISPs?
17 matches
Mail list logo
