anyone from cisco.com DNS Team around?

2020-12-09 Thread Thomas Mieslinger
Hi, I have trouble to activate my Cisco NCS5xxx Devices. Turns out that tools.cisco.com. resolves to either 173.37.145.8 (this works) or 72.163.4.38 (which was decommissioned earlier this year). By running dig A tools.cisco.com @alln01-ucs-dcz03n-gslb1-snip.cisco.com four times I can

Re: Anyone from AT DNS?

2017-10-08 Thread Mark Andrews
In message

Re: Anyone from AT DNS?

2017-10-08 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <50298399-672d-4ba1-a726-7128b84b8...@apple.com>, Matt Peterman writes: > Got it! You’re the winner here. I just setup both of my zones the name > way and obviously AT changed the way they did RDNS entries from when I > got a /25 last November and this second /25 in June. Oh well! >

Re: Anyone from AT DNS?

2017-10-05 Thread Jay Farrell via NANOG
Yep, the notation with the slash used to be ATT's standard method. At my job (where we had some customers with ATT MIS T1 circuits) we transitioned to a web front end for our DNS that didn't allow for the slash, so we had to nudge ATT to allow us to use a dash notation instead for delegations. As

Re: Anyone from AT DNS?

2017-10-04 Thread Matt Peterman
I can now confirm that Christopher is right about everything (not that I had any doubts! Just wanted to confirm all is working!!) ATT is now following the RFC (apparently has changed since November 2016 and June 2017 allocations and DNS changes) and that Route53 WebUI displays things

Re: Anyone from AT DNS?

2017-10-04 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Matt Peterman wrote: > Got it! You’re the winner here. I just setup both of my zones the name way > and obviously AT changed the way they did RDNS entries from when I got a > /25 last November and this second /25 in June. Oh well! > > Now I

Re: Anyone from AT DNS?

2017-10-04 Thread Matt Peterman
gt; $ dig +short CNAME 128.168.207.107.in-addr.arpa >> 128.128/25.168.207.107.in-addr.arpa. >> >> Which is obviously a completely invalid DNS entry. I have opened a ticket >> through the web portal for “prov-dns” but Haven’t gotten a response for 7 >> days. >> >

Re: Anyone from AT DNS?

2017-10-04 Thread Christopher Morrow
gt;> The PTR record CNAMEs for my /25 allocated prefix are all messed up. They >> are returning as >> $ dig +short CNAME 128.168.207.107.in-addr.arpa >> 128.128/25.168.207.107.in-addr.arpa. >> >> Which is obviously a completely invalid DNS entry. I have opened a ticket >>

Re: Anyone from AT DNS?

2017-10-04 Thread Christopher Morrow
returning as >> $ dig +short CNAME 128.168.207.107.in-addr.arpa >> 128.128/25.168.207.107.in-addr.arpa. >> >> Which is obviously a completely invalid DNS entry. I have opened a ticket >> through the web portal for “prov-dns” but Haven’t gotten a response for 7 &

Re: Anyone from AT DNS?

2017-10-04 Thread Matt Peterman
68.207.107.in-addr.arpa > 128.128/25.168.207.107.in-addr.arpa. > > Which is obviously a completely invalid DNS entry. I have opened a ticket > through the web portal for “prov-dns” but Haven’t gotten a response for 7 > days. > > If anyone from AT DNS or knows anyone from AT

Re: Anyone from AT DNS?

2017-10-04 Thread Matt Peterman
e opened a ticket > through the web portal for “prov-dns” but Haven’t gotten a response for 7 > days. > > If anyone from AT DNS or knows anyone from AT DNS that can help it would > be appreciated! > > > isn't this one of the proper forms of reverse delegation in

Re: Anyone from AT DNS?

2017-10-04 Thread Christopher Morrow
s obviously a completely invalid DNS entry. I have opened a ticket > through the web portal for “prov-dns” but Haven’t gotten a response for 7 > days. > > If anyone from AT DNS or knows anyone from AT DNS that can help it > would be appreciated! > > isn't this one of the proper fo

Anyone from AT DNS?

2017-10-04 Thread Matt Peterman
” but Haven’t gotten a response for 7 days. If anyone from AT DNS or knows anyone from AT DNS that can help it would be appreciated! Matt