tion, not sure why rule X is in there,
things of this nature).
-Pete
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Tony Varriale wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "gordon b slater"
> To: "Tony Varriale"
> Cc:
> Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 4:38 AM
> Sub
- Original Message -
From: "gordon b slater"
To: "Tony Varriale"
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 4:38 AM
Subject: Re: BGP support on ASA5585-X
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 21:50 -0500, Tony Varriale wrote:
said:
>They could make it out of the box but thi
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 21:50 -0500, Tony Varriale wrote:
> said:
> >They could make it out of the box but this is why Dylan made his statement.
>
> His statement is far fetched at best. Unless of course he's speaking of 100
> million line ACLs.
Can I just ask out of technical curiosity:
Q: Wh
- Original Message -
From:
To: "Greg Whynott"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: BGP support on ASA5585-X
They could make it out of the box but this is why Dylan made his statement.
His statement is far fetched at best. Unless of course he's
he ASA line is quite out of balance.
-Original Message-
From: "Greg Whynott"
Sent: Tuesday, November 2, 2010 1:46pm
To: "Dylan Ebner"
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org"
Subject: Re: BGP support on ASA5585-X
i couldn't disagree with this statement more than I do.
the
- Original Message -
From: "Dylan Ebner"
To: "srg" ;
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 12:42 PM
Subject: RE: BGP support on ASA5585-X
IMHO, I don't think this is a marketing issue for cisco. It's a design
issue. PIX/ASA is good at some things, and b
t; stateful inspection, access lists, maybe VPN services, and BGP for a 100Mb+
> internet connection on even a 5585. They just aren't that powerful.
>
>
>
>
>
> Dylan Ebner
>
> -Original Message-
> From: srg [mailto:srgqwe...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday
ul inspection, access lists, maybe VPN services, and BGP for a 100Mb+
> internet connection on even a 5585. They just aren't that powerful.
>
>
>
>
>
> Dylan Ebner
>
> -Original Message-
> From: srg [mailto:srgqwe...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October
ober 29, 2010 12:43 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: BGP support on ASA5585-X
Hi:
At this moment we know that ASA5585-X does not support BGP.
Does anybody know if BGP support in the ASA5585-X is in roadmap?
More precisely... MP-BGP support in the ASA5585-X?
Any "oficial" link in the Cisco w
Juniper srx runs JunOS.
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Jeffrey Lyon
wrote:
>
> Juniper Netscreen does, in case the OP is looking for alternatives.
>
> Best regards, Jeff
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.li...@gmail.com)
/security/asa/asa80/configuration/guide/glossary.html#wp1027964
>
> he security appliance does not support BGP.
>
> -Kevin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "David DiGiacomo"
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 1:45pm
> To: "srg" , "nanog@nanog.org"
&
David DiGiacomo"
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 1:45pm
To: "srg" , "nanog@nanog.org"
Subject: RE: BGP support on ASA5585-X
I would seriously doubt it. Think of it from Cisco's point of view; If the ASA
ran BGP, you wouldn't need to buy a router.
our fine router products too.'
-g
From: srg [srgqwe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 1:42 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: BGP support on ASA5585-X
Hi:
At this moment we know that ASA5585-X does not support BGP.
Does anybody know i
-5050
-Original Message-
From: srg [mailto:srgqwe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 1:43 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: BGP support on ASA5585-X
Hi:
At this moment we know that ASA5585-X does not support BGP.
Does anybody know if BGP support in the ASA5585-X is in roadmap?
Hi:
At this moment we know that ASA5585-X does not support BGP.
Does anybody know if BGP support in the ASA5585-X is in roadmap?
More precisely... MP-BGP support in the ASA5585-X?
Any "oficial" link in the Cisco website about this? (I did't find it)
Thanks a lot and best regards
15 matches
Mail list logo
