On Thursday, July 17, 2014 12:24:45 PM Nick Hilliard wrote:
there are other drawbacks too: the difference in
convergence time between 24k prefixes and a full dfz
is usually going to be large although I haven't tested
this on an me3600x yet.
Not having to install the routes into FIB (even
Thanks everyone for insightful answers!
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 6:09 AM, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote:
On Monday, July 14, 2014 07:32:43 PM Jeff Tantsura wrote:
Mark,
BGP to RIB filtering (in any vendor implementation) is
targeting RR which is not in the forwarding path, so
@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Best practice for BGP session/ full routes for customer
On Monday, July 07, 2014 08:33:12 PM Anurag Bhatia wrote:
In this scenario what is best practice for giving full
table to downstream?
In our case, we have three types of edge routers; Juniper
On Monday, July 14, 2014 07:32:43 PM Jeff Tantsura wrote:
Mark,
BGP to RIB filtering (in any vendor implementation) is
targeting RR which is not in the forwarding path, so
there¹s no forwarding towards any destination filtered
out from RIB.
Using it selectively on a forwarding node is
in blackholing.
Cheers,
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu
Organization: SEACOM
Reply-To: mark.ti...@seacom.mu
Date: Tuesday, July 8, 2014 at 1:56 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Best practice for BGP session/ full routes for customer
On Monday
On Monday, July 07, 2014 08:33:12 PM Anurag Bhatia wrote:
In this scenario what is best practice for giving full
table to downstream?
In our case, we have three types of edge routers; Juniper
MX480 + Cisco ASR1006, and the Cisco ME3600X.
For the MX480 and ASR1006 have no problems supporting
On Monday, July 07, 2014 08:46:05 PM Jason Lixfeld wrote:
1. You already know that multihop is very ugly. If it's
for a one-off, it's probably fine. But building a
product around multi-hop wouldn't be my first choice.
We prefer Layer 2 bundling technologies like 802.1AX, POS
bundles or
On Monday, July 07, 2014 08:46:05 PM Jason Lixfeld wrote:
3. If your network is MPLS enabled, you can do a routed
pseudowire from a BGP speaking router with a full table
to the access router (PE). Other tunnelling
technologies can probably do the same thing; GRE, L2TPv3
and also a plain'ol
Hello everyone!
I have quick question on how you provide full BGP table to downstream
customers?
Most of large networks have few border routers (Internet gateways) which
get full table feed and then they have Access routers on which customers
are terminated. Now I don't think it makes sense to
1. You already know that multihop is very ugly. If it's for a one-off, it's
probably fine. But building a product around multi-hop wouldn't be my first
choice.
2. Most of the router/switch vendors that can support a full table are pretty
expensive, per port. Your best bet here might be to
10 matches
Mail list logo
