The Linux Kernel itself may be GPL (which I wasn't debating), however I see no
reason why MikroTik's MPLS stack couldn't work in a similar way to the closed
source NVidia driers where my understanding is that a GPL stub loads a binary
blob.
Have you asked MikroTik for a copy of the source?
Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us writes:
What's the state of MPLS on Linux these days?
There was some renewed interest recently (i.e. last year). See the
discussion starting at
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg180282.html
But do note davem's replies in
Edward Dore edward.d...@freethought-internet.co.uk writes:
They used to publish the source for their 2.4 kernel on
routerboard.com (in fact, it's still available at
http://routerboard.com/files/linux-2.4.31.zip), but I've not seen
anything for the 2.6 kernel however and the routerboard.com
@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, 29 August, 2012 2:00:52 AM
Subject: Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited
I'm fairly sure that Mikrotik software is based on linux, and supports MPLS.
Not too sure which package they use, or if they rolled their own MPLS
support...
- Original Message -
From
@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, 29 August, 2012 2:00:52 AM
Subject: Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited
I'm fairly sure that Mikrotik software is based on linux, and supports MPLS.
Not too sure which package they use, or if they rolled their own MPLS
support...
- Original Message
recently
however.
Edward Dore
Freethought Internet
- Original Message -
From: Walter Keen walter.k...@rainierconnect.net
To: Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, 29 August, 2012 2:00:52 AM
Subject: Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited
, August 28, 2012 4:42:14 PM
Subject: Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited
What's the state of MPLS on Linux these days?
~Seth
- Original Message -
From: Walter Keen walter.k...@rainierconnect.net
To: Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, 29 August, 2012 2:00:52 AM
Subject: Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited
I'm fairly sure that Mikrotik software is based on linux, and supports MPLS.
Not too sure
: Wednesday, 29 August, 2012 2:00:52 AM
Subject: Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited
I'm fairly sure that Mikrotik software is based on linux, and supports MPLS.
Not too sure which package they use, or if they rolled their own MPLS
support...
- Original Message -
From: Seth
Personally I would like to see more work on all three opensource
implementations, i.e. BIRD, OpenBGPd and Quagga.
http://opensourcerouting.org/ to the rescue?
Hi, I'm David Lamparter, employed at the OpenSourceRouting (OSR) project
to maintain Quagga.
I can tell you that the OSR's interest
What's the state of MPLS on Linux these days?
~Seth
Subject: Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited
What's the state of MPLS on Linux these days?
~Seth
Fell free to contact me if you have any questions about ExaBGP as I am
painfully aware it's documentation is nowhere near what it should be.
Thomas
Sent from my iPad
On 23 Aug 2012, at 08:52, Andy Davidson a...@nosignal.org wrote:
On 22 Aug 2012, at 18:42, David Hubbard
On 23 Aug 2012, at 15:04, Raymond Burkholder r...@oneunified.net wrote:
To expand the opinion set, how do Quagga, Bird, exaBGP, OpenBGPd hold up for
handling Multi-Protocol BGP Route Reflector duties in a BGP/MPLS environment
for a smaller ISP?
I am using BIRD as a RR between a busy VRF and
Don't forget about XORP if you have any need for multicast routing ...
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Hank Nussbacher h...@efes.iucc.ac.il wrote:
Sorry to disrupt the bad cabling thread, but I'd like to revisit a thread
from 2 years ago. I have read over the NANOG presentations:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:42 PM, David Hubbard
dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com wrote:
Of those who have used Quagga or Bird, or anything else,
would either of them be appropriate and/or well suited for
use as an iBGP blackhole route server? We currently
do blackholes via manual config on one of
On 22 Aug 2012, at 18:42, David Hubbard dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com wrote:
Of those who have used Quagga or Bird, or anything else,
would either of them be appropriate and/or well suited for
use as an iBGP blackhole route server?
You can use Quagga or Bird as a blackhole BGP injector,
Of those who have used Quagga or Bird, or anything else,
would either of them be appropriate and/or well suited for
use as an iBGP blackhole route server?
To expand the opinion set, how do Quagga, Bird, exaBGP, OpenBGPd hold up for
handling Multi-Protocol BGP Route Reflector duties in a
On 22/08/12 06:19, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
Sorry to disrupt the bad cabling thread, but I'd like to revisit a
thread from 2 years ago. I have read over the NANOG presentations:
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog48/presentations/Monday/Jasinska_RouteServer_N48.pdf
On 22/08/12 06:19, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
...Any feedback appreciated.
I can't speak too highly of BIRD. Our use case is probably not
completely typical, but our multilateral peering route servers have been
hugely improved by switching to BIRD. Our two primary route servers,
one for each LINX
Hello,
I came across this site a few weeks ago
http://code.google.com/p/google-quagga/source/list
Seems that Google (or at least some Googlers) are working on quagga, or
worked as the last update is tagged July 2011.
Main difference I see between Quagga and Bird, is that it is now possible
to
Of those who have used Quagga or Bird, or anything else,
would either of them be appropriate and/or well suited for
use as an iBGP blackhole route server? We currently
do blackholes via manual config on one of our real
routers but are wanting to add a software-based (on linux)
system where we
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:42 PM, David Hubbard
dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com wrote:
Of those who have used Quagga or Bird, or anything else,
would either of them be appropriate and/or well suited for
use as an iBGP blackhole route server? We currently
do blackholes via manual config on one of
On 22.08.2012 11:22, John Souter wrote:
On 22/08/12 06:19, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
...Any feedback appreciated.
I can't speak too highly of BIRD. Our use case is probably not
completely typical, but our multilateral peering route servers have been
hugely improved by switching to BIRD. Our
Personally I would like to see more work on all three opensource
implementations, i.e. BIRD, OpenBGPd and Quagga.
http://opensourcerouting.org/ to the rescue?
--
Christian Esteve Rothenberg, Ph.D.
Converged Networks Business Unit
CPqD - Center for Research and Development in
Sorry to disrupt the bad cabling thread, but I'd like to revisit a thread
from 2 years ago. I have read over the NANOG presentations:
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog48/presentations/Monday/Jasinska_RouteServer_N48.pdf
26 matches
Mail list logo
