Re: Bonded SDSL

2010-01-06 Thread sthaug
It's being done by Actelis, Hatteras, and Zhone. More exactly SHDSL or similar variants. The market is being well-served. ^ The highlighted sentence is precisely the difference between what they are doing and what I am doing. The SHDSL folks seem to live in some kind

Re: Bonded SDSL (was RE: ITU G.992.5 Annex M - ADSL2+M Questions)

2010-01-05 Thread Steve Bertrand
upstream, I thought I would be brave and ask: do you esteemed high-end network op folks think that there may be anyone in the world who might be interested in bonded SDSL or not? I have spent the past 5 years of my life learning everything there is to know about SDSL. Don't ask me why, I

Re: Bonded SDSL

2010-01-05 Thread sthaug
Sorry that I'm coming into this thread late (I have just subscribed), but since I see people discussing DSL with beefy upstream, I thought I would be brave and ask: do you esteemed high-end network op folks think that there may be anyone in the world who might be interested in bonded SDSL

Re: Bonded SDSL

2010-01-05 Thread Steve Bertrand
be interested in bonded SDSL or not? Not only is there interest, it is actually seeing significant use - at least here in Norway. Typical case is bonding 2 or 4 SHDSL links for a total capacity of 4 or 8 Mbps. Out of curiosity, in Norway, who owns the copper? What is your revenue/lease cost ratio

Re: Bonded SDSL

2010-01-05 Thread sthaug
Sorry that I'm coming into this thread late (I have just subscribed), but since I see people discussing DSL with beefy upstream, I thought I would be brave and ask: do you esteemed high-end network op folks think that there may be anyone in the world who might be interested in bonded

RE: Bonded SDSL (was RE: ITU G.992.5 Annex M - ADSL2+M Questions)

2010-01-05 Thread Frank Bulk - iName.com
It's being done by Actelis, Hatteras, and Zhone. More exactly SHDSL or similar variants. The market is being well-served. Frank -Original Message- From: Michael Sokolov [mailto:msoko...@ivan.harhan.org] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 9:40 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Bonded SDSL

RE: Bonded SDSL (was RE: ITU G.992.5 Annex M - ADSL2+M Questions)

2010-01-05 Thread Michael Sokolov
flavors used by the DSLAM brands deployed by the two networks named above, and I want to build bonded SDSL CPE for those flavors/networks. And yes, I have already had discussions with some people at both of the named companies. It wasn't even necessary for me to initiate contact with them as both

Bonded SDSL (was RE: ITU G.992.5 Annex M - ADSL2+M Questions)

2010-01-04 Thread Michael Sokolov
be brave and ask: do you esteemed high-end network op folks think that there may be anyone in the world who might be interested in bonded SDSL or not? I have spent the past 5 years of my life learning everything there is to know about SDSL. Don't ask me why, I don't really know the answer