OK - That makes sense. For scaling a CP, it only about redundancy,
correct, but with the DP it's really about scaling up and out. But still, a
CP is no longer on the bus with the DP, nor on the network. It's on the
WAN/Internet, and latencies are orders of magnitude greater. Is anybody
doing
What is it about the architecture that makes it a preferred solution. I
get that centralizing the user databases makes sense, but why the control
plane. What benefit does that have?
-- Tom
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 2:17 PM wrote:
> The CUPS makes a lot of sense for this application. Latency
The CUPS makes a lot of sense for this application. Latency is dependent on the
design, and equipment used. I’ve seen/done several designs for this using two
different vendors equipment and two different BNG software stacks.
When I do a design for BNG from scratch, this is how I do it now. :)
Anyone have any thoughts on this CUPS thing? I have a customer asking, but
it seems the lack of CP resiliency and additional latency between the DP
and CP make this a really dumb idea. Has anyone tried it? Does it make
any sense?
Thanks!
4 matches
Mail list logo
