Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Baldur Norddahl" <baldur.nordd...@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2016 1:08:17 PM
Subject: Re: Canada joins the 21st century !
W
We have customers with 150/30 Mbps service on DSL and next year we will
get 300 Mbps. We are just renting access, it is the ILEC that decided to
make a large roll out with vectoring, pair bonding and VDSL2 annex 35b.
I would say that the majority around here can get at least 50/10 from
DSL.
+1
Joe Loiacono
From: Mike Hammett <na...@ics-il.net>
To:
Cc: Nanog@nanog.org
Date: 12/23/2016 08:20 AM
Subject: Re: Canada joins the 21st century !
Sent by:"NANOG" <nanog-boun...@nanog.org>
The government getting involved with the Internet rare
-
From: "Rod Beck" <rod.b...@unitedcablecompany.com>
To: "Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net>
Cc: Nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2016 5:20:18 PM
Subject: Re: Canada joins the 21st century !
Thousands of ISPs that collectively add up to a pimple on
broadband penetration
rates using other approaches.
From: NANOG <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> on behalf of Mike Hammett
<na...@ics-il.net>
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2016 10:58 PM
Cc: Nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Canada joins the 21st century
Canada should just have Comcast (or is it "Xfinity"?) provided nation-wide
Internet service as a for-profit monopoly.
Just as long as we have *someone* to Telus whom to chose.
Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "John Sage" <js...@finchhaven.com>
To: Nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2016 8:23:26 AM
Subject: Re: Canada joins the 21st century !
On 12/23/2016 05:18 AM, Mi
On 12/23/2016 05:18 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
The government getting involved with the Internet rarely goes well. The FCC is
a shining example of how to usually do it wrong.
I agree. To hell with 'government'. What has it done for you lately, anyway?
Canada should just have Comcast (or is it
On 2016-12-23 10:37, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> It would certainly suck to be an ISP in Canada and be forced to fund
> your competitors. Or does Canada not have any small privately run ISPs
> like we do in the US?
We not only have smaller ISPs, but also a wholesale framework where ISPs
can
On 12/22/16 6:59 AM, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:
Nothing happens for now because a "follow up" process is needed to
decide how the funding mechanism will work (what portions of a companies
revenues are counted to calculated its mandated contribution to fund)
and how the process of bidding for
To: Nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 8:59:22 AM
> Subject: Canada joins the 21st century !
>
> This is more of an FYI.
>
> Yesterday, the CRTC released a big decision on broadband. In 2011, the
> same process resulted in CRTC to not declare the Internet as &qu
Mezei" <jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca>
To: Nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 8:59:22 AM
Subject: Canada joins the 21st century !
This is more of an FYI.
Yesterday, the CRTC released a big decision on broadband. In 2011, the
same process resulted in CRTC to not decl
Jean-Francois Mezei wrote on 12/22/2016 8:59 AM:
...
Yesterday, the CRTC declared the Internet to be a basic service (which
enables additional regulatory powers) and set speed goals to 50/10.
Note that this is not a definition of broadband as the FCC had done, it
one of many criteria that will
This is more of an FYI.
Yesterday, the CRTC released a big decision on broadband. In 2011, the
same process resulted in CRTC to not declare the Internet as "basic
service" and to set speed goals to 1990s 5/1.
Yesterday, the CRTC declared the Internet to be a basic service (which
enables
14 matches
Mail list logo
