We pay $4 per SIM with at&t then about $2.50 per MB.
Cheers
Ryan
From: PC [mailto:paul4...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 12:15 PM
To: Ryan Finnesey
Cc: rche...@rochester.rr.com; nanog@nanog.org; David Hubbard
Subject: Re: Cell-based OOB management devices
Second
.rr.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 6:41 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org; David Hubbard
> Subject: Re: Cell-based OOB management devices
>
> David, a Sprint aircard can be had with a static-ip, so that should ease
> remote connectivity requirements. Or, you can opt for the D
sday, November 15, 2011 6:41 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org; David Hubbard
Subject: Re: Cell-based OOB management devices
David, a Sprint aircard can be had with a static-ip, so that should ease remote
connectivity requirements. Or, you can opt for the Datalink (private VPN)
service, which separates your air
A very flexible solution can be done with the Mikrotik family of routerssee
this as an example for more details..
http://mum.mikrotik.com/presentations/BR09/3G_Applications.pdf
Faisal
On Nov 15, 2011, at 6:34 AM, wrote:
> David, a Sprint aircard can be had with a static-ip, so that should
David, a Sprint aircard can be had with a static-ip, so that should ease remote
connectivity requirements. Or, you can opt for the Datalink (private VPN)
service, which separates your aircard traffic from other customers within a
VRF, obviating the need to run a separate VPN client.
-RC
David, a Sprint aircard can be had with a static-ip, so that should ease remote
connectivity requirements. Or, you can opt for the Datalink (private VPN)
service, which separates your aircard traffic from other customers within a
VRF, obviating the need to run a separate VPN client.
-RC
ck in ROMMON.
- Some of this can even be automated by their device.
--Original Message--
From: David Hubbard
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Cell-based OOB management devices
Sent: Nov 7, 2011 1:14 AM
Hi all, I am looking at cellular-based devices as a higher
speed alternative to dial-up b
>
> On Nov 6, 2011 10:15 PM, "David Hubbard"
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all, I am looking at cellular-based devices as a higher
> > speed alternative to dial-up backup access methods for
> > out of band management during emergencies.
>
I've used the Digi devices for Clearwire site OOB and in many retail
On Nov 6, 2011 10:15 PM, "David Hubbard"
wrote:
>
> Hi all, I am looking at cellular-based devices as a higher
> speed alternative to dial-up backup access methods for
> out of band management during emergencies. I was
> wondering if anyone had experiences with such devices
> they could share?
>
On Nov 7, 2011, at 1:14 PM, David Hubbard wrote:
> Hi all, I am looking at cellular-based devices as a higher speed alternative
> to dial-up backup access methods for
> out of band management during emergencies.
Some of the lower-end Cisco routers have '3G' interfaces available as an
option, I
On 11/6/11 10:14 PM, David Hubbard wrote:
> Hi all, I am looking at cellular-based devices as a higher
> speed alternative to dial-up backup access methods for
> out of band management during emergencies. I was
> wondering if anyone had experiences with such devices
> they could share?
>
> Device
Hi all, I am looking at cellular-based devices as a higher
speed alternative to dial-up backup access methods for
out of band management during emergencies. I was
wondering if anyone had experiences with such devices
they could share?
Devices I've found include Sierra Wireless AirLink Raven X,
Di
13 matches
Mail list logo
