Subject: Re: Cisco Crosswork Network Insights - or how to destroy a useful
service
Hello,
we would be happy to collaborate to deploy and extend the ARTEMIS open-source
software tool
for monitoring, detection and potential automated mitigation of prefix hijacks,
available on GitHub at https
Hello,
we would be happy to collaborate to deploy and extend the ARTEMIS
open-source software tool
for monitoring, detection and potential automated mitigation of prefix
hijacks,
available on GitHub at https://github.com/FORTH-ICS-INSPIRE/artemis .
Current monitoring sources include RIS li
Thus spake Job Snijders (j...@ntt.net) on Wed, May 15, 2019 at 12:16:06PM +0200:
>
> I recognise the issue you describe, and I'd like to share with you that
> we're going down another road. Nowadays, RIPE NCC offers a streaming API
> ("RIS Live") which has the data needed to analyse and correlate
I would like to point out another more straightforward ignorant UI
design decision for this new service. The login screen assumes and
requires all Cisco.com account usernames to be email addresses. Many
are not, especially for folks like me who have had theirs for decades.
On 5/15/2019 4:50 AM,
https://honestnetworker.net/2019/01/31/recent-bgpmon-net-announcement/
From: NANOG on behalf of
Mike Hammett
Date: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 at 8:35 AM
To: Hank Nussbacher
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org"
Subject: Re: Cisco Crosswork Network Insights - or how to destroy a usefu
ect: Cisco Crosswork Network Insights - or how to destroy a useful service
I have started to use Cisco Crosswork Network Insights which is the replacement
for BGPmon and I am shocked at how Cisco has managed to destroy a useful tool.
I have had a paid 50 prefix account since the day BGPmon became ava
https://bgpmon.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/BGPMon.net-EOL-EOS-faq.pdfOn May 15, 2019 14:52, "Mann, Jason" wrote:
Is BGPmon going away?
From: NANOG on behalf of Hank Nussbacher
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 3:50 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Cisco Crosswork Network Insights -
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 11:52:16AM +, Mann, Jason via NANOG wrote:
> ?Is BGPmon going away?
Yes, see
https://bgpmon.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/BGPMon.net-EOL-EOS-faq.pdf
Kind regards,
Job
?Is BGPmon going away?
From: NANOG on behalf of Hank Nussbacher
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 3:50 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Cisco Crosswork Network Insights - or how to destroy a useful service
I have started to use Cisco Crosswork Network Insights
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 11:37:57AM +0100, Carlos Friaças wrote:
> It relies *exclusively* on "RIPE RIS Live", or does it also use other
> sources?
The first useful version will rely exclusively on the "RIS Live"
interface. In a later stage we can consider adding something like the
NLNOG Looking Gl
Hi Job, All,
It relies *exclusively* on "RIPE RIS Live", or does it also use other
sources?
Regards,
Carlos
On Wed, 15 May 2019, Job Snijders wrote:
Hi,
I recognise the issue you describe, and I'd like to share with you that
we're going down another road. Nowadays, RIPE NCC offers a str
Hi,
I recognise the issue you describe, and I'd like to share with you that
we're going down another road. Nowadays, RIPE NCC offers a streaming API
("RIS Live") which has the data needed to analyse and correlate BGP
UPDATES seen in the wild to business rules you as operator define.
NTT folks are
I have started to use Cisco Crosswork Network Insights which is the
replacement for BGPmon and I am shocked at how Cisco has managed to
destroy a useful tool.I have had a paid 50 prefix account since the day
BGPmon became available and helped two clients implement a 500 prefix
license over the
13 matches
Mail list logo
