oincidence, but these seems like a direct line from problem to
resolution.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett"
To: "NANOG"
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 12:21:29 AM
www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
From: "Mike Hammett"
To: "NANOG"
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 12:21:29 AM
Subject: Cisco Nexus 3k Route Selection\Packet Forwarding Debugging
We have a Nexus 3064 that is setup with partial BGP tables and is routing based
o
Sent from my iPhoneOn Apr 16, 2023, at 10:05, Mike Hammett wrote:We did have our common upstream provider perform maintenance that then afterwards, had the traffic flowing on the right path. Later activity on our direct connection pushed it back to the common upstream. We haven't yet had the
.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett"
To: "NANOG"
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 12:21:29 AM
Subject: Cisco Nexus 3k Route Selection\Packet Forwarding Debuggin
ike Hammett"
> *Cc: *"Matthew Huff" , "NANOG"
> *Sent: *Tuesday, April 4, 2023 11:39:26 AM
> *Subject: *Re: Cisco Nexus 3k Route Selection\Packet Forwarding Debugging
>
> If you are both connected to the same upstream, but the customer wants
> traffic d
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "David Bass"
To: "Mike Hammett"
Cc: "Matthew Huff" , "NANOG"
Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 11:39:26 AM
Subject: Re: Cisco Nexus 3k Route Selection\Packet Forwarding Debugging
t; Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>> Midwest-IX
>> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>>
>> --
>> *From: *"Mike Hammett"
>> *To: *"Matthew Huff"
>> *Cc: *"NANOG"
Hammett"
Cc: "Matthew Huff" , "NANOG"
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 9:12:52 PM
Subject: Re: Cisco Nexus 3k Route Selection\Packet Forwarding Debugging
You said that they are seeing traffic from another upstream…are you advertising
the prefix to them? Are you adverti
ic 4000 30 255 1 1500
> route-map rmap_static_to_eigrp, permit, sequence 10
> Match clauses:
> ip address prefix-lists: prefix_static_to_eigrp
> Set clauses:
> route-map rmap_static_to_eigrp_v6, permit, sequence 10
> Match clauses:
> ipv6 address prefix-list
http://www.midwest-ix.com
From: "Mike Hammett"
To: "Matthew Huff"
Cc: "NANOG"
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 8:26:30 AM
Subject: Re: Cisco Nexus 3k Route Selection\Packet Forwarding Debugging
Only two VRFs, default and manangement. IIRC, everything I saw bef
-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Huff"
To: "Mike Hammett"
Cc: "NANOG"
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 8:06:51 AM
Subject: RE: Cisco Nexus 3k Route Selection\Packet Forwarding Debugging
What about VRFs and/or
clauses:
ipv6 address prefix-lists: prefix_ipv6_static_to_eigrp
Set clauses:
From: Mike Hammett
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 9:00 AM
To: Matthew Huff
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Cisco Nexus 3k Route Selection\Packet Forwarding Debugging
It could be an sFlow bug, but I come at this from
://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Huff"
To: "Mike Hammett"
Cc: "NANOG"
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 7:50:08 AM
Subject: RE: Cisco Nexus 3k Route Selection\Packet Forwarding Debugging
SFlow mis
ett" mailto:na...@ics-il.net>>, "NANOG"
mailto:nanog@nanog.org>>
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 5:38:23 AM
Subject: RE: Cisco Nexus 3k Route Selection\Packet Forwarding Debugging
switch-core1# sh forwarding route x.x.x.x
slot
;Mike Hammett"
To: "NANOG"
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 12:21:29 AM
Subject: Cisco Nexus 3k Route Selection\Packet Forwarding Debugging
We have a Nexus 3064 that is setup with partial BGP tables and is routing based
on that.
I've done a show ip bgp for an IP of interest an
ammett
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 1:21 AM
To: NANOG
Subject: Cisco Nexus 3k Route Selection\Packet Forwarding Debugging
We have a Nexus 3064 that is setup with partial BGP tables and is routing based
on that.
I've done a show ip bgp for an IP of interest and it has an expected next ho
o Nexus 3k Route Selection\Packet Forwarding Debugging
On 4/2/23 22:21, Mike Hammett wrote:
> We have a Nexus 3064 that is setup with partial BGP tables and is
> routing based on that.
>
>
> I've done a show ip bgp for an IP of interest and it has an expected
> next hop IP. I
lf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 1:21 AM
To: NANOG
Subject: Cisco Nexus 3k Route Selection\Packet Forwarding Debugging
We have a Nexus 3064 that is setup with partial BGP tables and is routing based
on that.
I've done a show ip bgp for an IP of interest and it has an expected next
On 4/2/23 22:21, Mike Hammett wrote:
We have a Nexus 3064 that is setup with partial BGP tables and is
routing based on that.
I've done a show ip bgp for an IP of interest and it has an expected
next hop IP. I show ip arp on that next hop IP and it has the expected
interface.
However,
On 4/2/23 22:21, Mike Hammett wrote:
We have a Nexus 3064 that is setup with partial BGP tables and is
routing based on that.
I've done a show ip bgp for an IP of interest and it has an expected
next hop IP. I show ip arp on that next hop IP and it has the expected
interface.
However,
Is the BGP route getting installed into the rib?
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023, 01:24 Mike Hammett wrote:
> We have a Nexus 3064 that is setup with partial BGP tables and is routing
> based on that.
>
>
> I've done a show ip bgp for an IP of interest and it has an expected next
> hop IP. I show ip arp
We have a Nexus 3064 that is setup with partial BGP tables and is routing based
on that.
I've done a show ip bgp for an IP of interest and it has an expected next hop
IP. I show ip arp on that next hop IP and it has the expected interface.
However, sFlows show the packets leaving on a
22 matches
Mail list logo
