It is more important that a domain registrar not refuse to register a
domain, or erroneously declare a valid listing invalid.
The purpose of using a registrar is to establish DNS delegation, not
to validate your site's redundancy meets the absolute best possible
practices for fault
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 06:56:29PM -0500,
Brett Frankenberger rbf+na...@panix.com wrote
a message of 15 lines which said:
How does your employer know if two nameservers (two IP addresses) are
on the same subnet?
The current heuristic for IPv4 is belongs in the same /28 (and /64
for IPv6).
Jimmy,
On May 28, 2012, at 9:58 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
The purpose of using a registrar is to establish DNS delegation, not
to validate your site's redundancy meets the absolute best possible
practices for fault tolerance.
Terminology nit: the purpose of a registrar is to allow folks the
Greetings everyone!
One small concern I wanted to discuss here. I know few registry/registrars
which do not accept both (or all) name servers of domain name on same
subnet. They demand at least 1 DNS server should be on different subnet for
failover reasons (old thoughts).
How one can deal with
Anurag,
On May 28, 2012, at 11:51 AM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
I know few registry/registrars
which do not accept both (or all) name servers of domain name on same
subnet. They demand at least 1 DNS server should be on different subnet for
failover reasons (old thoughts).
IMHO appropriately so.
Anurag Bhatia m...@anuragbhatia.com wrote:
One small concern I wanted to discuss here. I know few
registry/registrars which do not accept both (or all) name servers of
domain name on same subnet. They demand at least 1 DNS server should be
on different subnet for failover reasons (old
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote:
Anurag Bhatia m...@anuragbhatia.com wrote:
One small concern I wanted to discuss here. I know few
registry/registrars which do not accept both (or all) name servers of
domain name on same subnet. They demand at least 1 DNS
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:21:10AM +0530,
Anurag Bhatia m...@anuragbhatia.com wrote
a message of 28 lines which said:
I know few registry/registrars which do not accept both (or all)
name servers of domain name on same subnet.
Since my employer is one of these registries, let me mention
On May 28, 2012, at 15:24 , Anurag Bhatia wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote:
Anurag Bhatia m...@anuragbhatia.com wrote:
One small concern I wanted to discuss here. I know few
registry/registrars which do not accept both (or all) name servers of
domain
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.netwrote:
On May 28, 2012, at 15:24 , Anurag Bhatia wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote:
Anurag Bhatia m...@anuragbhatia.com wrote:
One small concern I wanted to discuss here. I know few
I am building redundancy within that setup. I mean it will be software
based BGP so if hardware if fried up, it will break BGP session and pull
off routes anyway and for cases like DNS server (software) failure, I will
monitor it via simple bash script which can turn bgp daemon down. So once
Q
--Message d'origine--
De : Randy Bush
À : Anurag Bhatia
Cc : NANOG Mailing List
Objet : Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs
registrar/registry policies
Envoyé : 28 mai, 2012 17:03
I am building redundancy within that setup. I mean it will be software
based BGP
maxlarson.he...@transversal.ht wrote:
Q
--Message d'origine--
De : Randy Bush
À : Anurag Bhatia
Cc : NANOG Mailing List
Objet : Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs
registrar/registry policies
Envoyé : 28 mai, 2012 17:03
...
Envoyé par mon BlackBerry de
List
Objet : Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs
registrar/registry policies
Envoyé : 28 mai, 2012 17:03
...
Envoyé par mon BlackBerry de Digicel
QED, eh?
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 09:32:29PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:21:10AM +0530,
Anurag Bhatia m...@anuragbhatia.com wrote
a message of 28 lines which said:
I know few registry/registrars which do not accept both (or all)
name servers of domain name on
On May 29, 2012, at 01:56 , Brett Frankenberger wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 09:32:29PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:21:10AM +0530,
Anurag Bhatia m...@anuragbhatia.com wrote
a message of 28 lines which said:
I know few registry/registrars which do not
In message 5ebc0868-05d2-435e-a671-e957af72f...@one.com, Mikkel Mondrup Krist
ensen writes:
On May 29, 2012, at 01:56 , Brett Frankenberger wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 09:32:29PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:21:10AM +0530,
Anurag Bhatia
On 5/28/12, David Conrad d...@virtualized.org wrote:
On May 28, 2012, at 11:51 AM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
I know few registry/registrars
which do not accept both (or all) name servers of domain name on same
subnet. They demand at least 1 DNS server should be on different subnet for
failover
18 matches
Mail list logo
