On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 6:38 PM Robert L Mathews wrote:
> I didn't see the page, but for what it's worth, this is governed by this
> ICANN policy:> https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/errp-2013-02-28-en
It is common that registrars repoint nameservers and redirect web traffic when a
domain's r
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote on 13/11/2021 09:25:
To my mind, I simply don't understand why some people continue to use
Network Solutions, with the track record they have.
indeed.
one aspect of this is that it's unusually difficult to migrate away
compared to other registrars. Only Primary Cont
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 03:13:57PM -0800,
William Herrin wrote
a message of 24 lines which said:
> To my mind, though, Netsol's server should not be responding with
> authoritative answers to random domains that aren't assigned to it.
> That it does makes me think it's a good candidate for bla
On 11/12/21 8:33 AM, Jeff Shultz wrote:
I still think that this is not the correct way for NetSol to handle this
situation, particularly since the pages they put up look like phishbait
designed by Austin Powers.
I didn't see the page, but for what it's worth, this is governed by this
ICANN po
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 3:09 PM Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>> DNSSEC would help here. NetSol's rogue nameserver wouldn't be able to
>> produce
>> the signed zone if validation were required.
>
> Nope, they could just remove the DS since they are the registrar for that
> domain. DNSSEC only protects ag
>
>
>
>
> DNSSEC would help here. NetSol's rogue nameserver wouldn't be able to
> produce
> the signed zone if validation were required.
>
>
Nope, they could just remove the DS since they are the registrar for that
domain. DNSSEC only protects against a DNS provider going rogue, not your
own hire
it points to 64.130.200.16 -
> which seems to give correct answers - or to 208.91.197.132 - which
> replies even for nonexisting domain names.
[..]
So yes, then.. A DNS Hijack by NetSol redirecting the hostname on an expired SLD
related to one of the individual nameserver hosts to a
faulty/non-compl
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 11:30 AM Stephane Bortzmeyer
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 09:44:04PM +,
> Richard wrote
> a message of 37 lines which said:
>
> > The second of these is returning the 208.nnn IPnumber for your
> > a-record:
> >
> >dig @VOYAGER.VISER.NET 2dpnr.org
> >
> >
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 09:44:04PM +,
Richard wrote
a message of 37 lines which said:
> The second of these is returning the 208.nnn IPnumber for your
> a-record:
>
>dig @VOYAGER.VISER.NET 2dpnr.org
>
>2dpnr.org. 300 IN A 208.91.197.132
It depends on where you are (from my resol
> Date: Thursday, November 11, 2021 13:28:07 -0800
> From: Jeff Shultz
>
> Okay, so this is anecdotal, but since the domain belongs to me it's
> more than a little annoying.
>
> I got some calls that one of my domains, 2dpnr.org was going to a
> page that said it was Network Solutions and that
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 7:07 AM Matthew Petach
wrote:
>
> I suspect it's more a case of
>
> domain foo.com provides DNS service for several other domains,
> including bar.com.
>
> bar.com is fully paid up.
>
> foo.com doesn't get paid up on time; expires, but is quickly
> re-claimed and paid up a
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 5:55 AM William Herrin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 6:36 PM Jeff Shultz
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Yeah, apparently when a domain expires, a lot of DNS queries to domains
> in that domain's DNS server... get redirected to a Network Solutions "this
> is expired" website at t
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 6:36 PM Jeff Shultz wrote:
>
>
> Yeah, apparently when a domain expires, a lot of DNS queries to domains in
> that domain's DNS server... get redirected to a Network Solutions "this is
> expired" website at that IP.
> Even though those domains are perfectly legit and paid
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 01:36:58PM -0800,
Jeff Shultz wrote
a message of 122 lines which said:
> Never mind, looks like an expired domain issue. Someone didn't remind
> someone else.
To avoid such a problem:
* some registries allow for multi-year registration,
* some registrars allow for mul
Yeah, apparently when a domain expires, a lot of DNS queries to domains in
that domain's DNS server... get redirected to a Network Solutions "this is
expired" website at that IP.
Even though those domains are perfectly legit and paid up. Or so it was
explained to me and how it appeared.
Anything I
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 01:28:07PM -0800,
Jeff Shultz wrote
a message of 105 lines which said:
> I hit my registrar, DirectNic, and found I'm good through 2023. They
> pulled up DNS checker and found that a bunch of DNS servers were
> showing 208.91.197.132 as the IP for the domain. It's actua
Never mind, looks like an expired domain issue. Someone didn't remind
someone else.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 1:28 PM Jeff Shultz wrote:
> Okay, so this is anecdotal, but since the domain belongs to me it's more
> than a little annoying.
>
> I got some calls that one of my domains, 2dpnr.org was g
Okay, so this is anecdotal, but since the domain belongs to me it's more
than a little annoying.
I got some calls that one of my domains, 2dpnr.org was going to a page that
said it was Network Solutions and that my domain was available for renew or
purchase.
I hit my registrar, DirectNic, and fou
18 matches
Mail list logo
