On Apr 15, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Jack Carrozzo wrote:
You can balance over DSL by putting different L2TPv3 tunnels over each
physical device and agg it at someplace with real connections and
such. It's possible to do it with GRE or OpenVPN too, but much less
classy.
As Jack points out,
On Thursday 15 April 2010 05:05:05 pm Bill Lewis wrote:
Since I'm told that DSL aggregation / mux is currently not possible, we
are looking at doing stream splitting via a technology like FatPipe
uses. Anyone have this in production usage? Or something similar?
No IMA over DSL? (IMA = Inverse
Group,
Since I'm told that DSL aggregation / mux is currently not possible, we
are looking at doing stream splitting via a technology like FatPipe
uses. Anyone have this in production usage? Or something similar?
Cisco has offered some ways to split via CEF, but most DSL carriers do
not have
, but it gives you lots of control for sure.
-Jack Carrozzo
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Bill Lewis ble...@hottopic.com wrote:
Group,
Since I'm told that DSL aggregation / mux is currently not possible, we
are looking at doing stream splitting via a technology like FatPipe
uses. Anyone have
rudimentary (ie. hack)
balancing by having a route for 0/1 and 128/1 with different next-hops.
It's pretty easy to setup balancing on an OpenBSD box with PF as well.
Truman
On 15/04/2010, at 5:05 PM, Bill Lewis wrote:
Group,
Since I'm told that DSL aggregation / mux is currently
...@hottopic.com wrote:
Group,
Since I'm told that DSL aggregation / mux is currently not possible, we
are looking at doing stream splitting via a technology like FatPipe
uses. Anyone have this in production usage? Or something similar?
Cisco has offered some ways to split via CEF
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Bill Lewis ble...@hottopic.com wrote:
Group,
Since I'm told that DSL aggregation / mux is currently not possible, we
are looking at doing stream splitting via a technology like FatPipe
uses. Anyone have this in production usage? Or something similar
7 matches
Mail list logo