Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-22 Thread Allan Liska
I'll throw in a recommendation for Dyn. The reliability and features are excellent and I love their support. allan > On Sep 21, 2016, at 10:10 PM, Justin Paine via NANOG wrote: > > I've had quite good luck with: Gandi, Hover, 101domains, and Google > Domains -- depending

RE: Domain renawals

2016-09-22 Thread Nick Farr
, YMMV, etc. -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ishmael Rufus Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 9:17 AM To: Jeff Jones Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: Domain renawals $9.88 for commercial domains seems under the average from what I've seen from other

Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-22 Thread Mikeal Clark
Yes I've had issues with providers dropping glue records! I have to email, and have a "advanced" support person fix them. The interface to do it myself has disappeared. Very frustrating. On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Richard Holbo wrote: > FWIW, as I'm in the middle of

Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-22 Thread Mark Andrews
In message

Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-22 Thread Richard Holbo
Since the circular notion of why we need glue records has already been addressed, I won't hit that here... I would agree with "you're probably having trouble with your registrar's user interface". In doing some work for a company that had a number of domains registered at 1and1.com, they (1and1)

Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-22 Thread John Levine
>In order for clients to find your nameserver to figure out what >NS1.example.com resolves to, >it first needs to be able to find a nameserver for Example.com, >which is NS1.example.com. > >This is what is circular without a Hint in the Additional section of >the DNS reply from the parent

Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-22 Thread Jimmy Hess
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 09/21/2016 01:44 PM, Richard Holbo wrote: >> FWIW, as I'm in the middle of this right now. It would appear that many of > What do you think glue records are, and why do you think you need them? :) > (Those are serious

Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-22 Thread Doug Barton
On 09/21/2016 01:44 PM, Richard Holbo wrote: FWIW, as I'm in the middle of this right now. It would appear that many of the less expensive registrars no longer support glue records in any meaningful way. They all expect you to host DNS with them. So might want to check on that before buying the

Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-21 Thread Peter Beckman
On Wed, 22 Sep 2016, John Levine wrote: For domain registration I found that joining the GoDaddy Domain Club ( $120/year or less if you pay ahead for multiple years [1] ) ... There's a lot of registrars with prepay discounts. Gandi's domains are cheaper if you prepay $600, a lot cheaper if

Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-21 Thread Lou Katz
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 08:52:29PM -, John Levine wrote: > In article >

Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-21 Thread Jimmy Hess
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:35 PM, John Levine wrote: >>For domain registration I found that joining the GoDaddy Domain Club >>( $120/year or less if you pay ahead for multiple years [1] ) ... > There's a lot of registrars with prepay discounts. Gandi's domains > are cheaper if you

Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-21 Thread Justin Paine via NANOG
I've had quite good luck with: Gandi, Hover, 101domains, and Google Domains -- depending on which cc/TLDs you're looking for. Justin Paine Head of Trust & Safety CloudFlare Inc. PGP: BBAA 6BCE 3305 7FD6 6452 7115 57B6 0114 DE0B 314D On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 6:35 PM, John Levine

Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-21 Thread John Levine
>For domain registration I found that joining the GoDaddy Domain Club >( $120/year or less if you pay ahead for multiple years [1] ) ... There's a lot of registrars with prepay discounts. Gandi's domains are cheaper if you prepay $600, a lot cheaper if you prepay $2000. R's, John

Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-21 Thread Peter Beckman
I use DNS Made Easy for all of my DNS hosting, which I'm happy to recommend. For domain registration I found that joining the GoDaddy Domain Club ( $120/year or less if you pay ahead for multiple years [1] ) is a good deal for the quantity of domains I own (56 and counting). It's kind of like

Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-21 Thread Harald Koch
There are still many registrars that don't support DNSSEC (possibly only for a subset of TLDs), and/or have an unusable or cumbersome interface for adding DNSSEC glue. Just another thing to watch out for...

Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-21 Thread Ken Chase
EasyDNS has gone beyond the normal registrar dilligence and has resisted bogus takedowns and other things, where many would just bend over backwards. They can do this a bit more easily by being in Canada as well:

Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-21 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , Jeff Jones writes: > Hello All, > > Sorry if this is low level. But are people sick of registrars jacking up > prices? Who is the cheapest and most reliable? I have been using whois.com, > networksolutions.com and

Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-21 Thread John Levine
In article

Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-21 Thread Richard Holbo
FWIW, as I'm in the middle of this right now. It would appear that many of the less expensive registrars no longer support glue records in any meaningful way. They all expect you to host DNS with them. So might want to check on that before buying the cheapest and hosting your own DNS. /rh On

Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-21 Thread Rich Kulawiec
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 01:19:43PM -0400, Jeff Jones wrote: Who is the cheapest and most reliable? I've had an excellent experience with NearlyFreeSpeech: https://www.nearlyfreespeech.net/ They have a high level of technical clue, don't try to upsell me things I don't need or want

Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-21 Thread Mark Blackman
> On 21 Sep 2016, at 19:43, james machado wrote: > > so who would you quantify as secure and reliable? who does not require > additional "services" besides registration or spend all their time trying > to upsell you? > > james I have always liked https://www.gandi.net/

Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-21 Thread Jim Mercer
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:43:50AM -0700, james machado wrote: > so who would you quantify as secure and reliable? who does not require > additional "services" besides registration or spend all their time trying > to upsell you? i'm good with easydns.com --jim > > james > > On Wed, Sep 21,

Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-21 Thread james machado
so who would you quantify as secure and reliable? who does not require additional "services" besides registration or spend all their time trying to upsell you? james On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Jim Mercer wrote: > > cheap, secure, reliable > > pick two. > > --jim > >

Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-21 Thread Jim Mercer
cheap, secure, reliable pick two. --jim On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Jeff Jones wrote: > Sorry if this is low level. But are people sick of registrars jacking up > prices? Who is the cheapest and most reliable? I have been using whois.com, > networksolutions.com

Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-21 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 13:19:43 -0400, Jeff Jones said: > networksolutions.com and am looking for input on who is cheap, secure, > reliable registrar. Thanks for your input. cheap, secure, reliable - pick any two. (The driver here is "cheap" - the other two criteria can be almost anything, but to

Re: Domain renawals

2016-09-21 Thread Ishmael Rufus
$9.88 for commercial domains seems under the average from what I've seen from other registrars On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Jeff Jones wrote: > Hello All, > > Sorry if this is low level. But are people sick of registrars jacking up > prices? Who is the cheapest and

Domain renawals

2016-09-21 Thread Jeff Jones
Hello All, Sorry if this is low level. But are people sick of registrars jacking up prices? Who is the cheapest and most reliable? I have been using whois.com, networksolutions.com and am looking for input on who is cheap, secure, reliable registrar. Thanks for your input. ~Jeff