> If you want to keep your domains, don't use .com or .net.
or .jobs, .names, .edu.
-J
On December 3, 2010, David Conrad wrote:
> When folks with guns and little sense of humor show up at your door with
> a sealed court ordered warrant relating to resources you have direct
> authority over, would you tell them to talk to a retailer for that
> resource? Oh, and don't forget VeriSign
yea... so I wonder if the NCFTA folks would pony up warrants for
things like the content highlighted by www.abuse.ch ?
They do all sorts of stuff, but for obvious reasons they don't gossip
about it in public.
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummi
I think Verisign DBMS acts as a registrar for ccTLDs.
No, they're a registry. Not the same thing.
The registry holds the definitive database and manages the DNS zone.
Registrars face the public and use some sort of API to pass the changes to
the registry.
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@iecc.c
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 1:10 PM, David Conrad wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2010, at 5:49 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>> thanks... so, in this case, why did they take this action?
>
> When folks with guns and little sense of humor show up at your door with a
> sealed court ordered warrant relating to resou
* John R. Levine:
>>> We do remember, don't we, that the domain that started this discussion
>>> were shut down by Verisign, the registry, not a registrar?
>
>> interesting that in THIS case the registry just took the action, was
>> the domain registered through their registrar arm?
>
> They haven
On Dec 3, 2010, at 5:49 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> thanks... so, in this case, why did they take this action?
When folks with guns and little sense of humor show up at your door with a
sealed court ordered warrant relating to resources you have direct authority
over, would you tell them to
Does anyone have any experience with eNom in this regard -- compliance and
operating under 'pressure' from outside authorities?
--sth
On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:55 PM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> We use OpenSRS and never have these issues. Many of the other major
> registrars will freeze domains for whatev
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 10:49:47AM -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:45 AM, John R. Levine wrote:
> >>> We do remember, don't we, that the domain that started this discussion
> >>> were shut down by Verisign, the registry, not a registrar?
> >> interesting that in THI
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:45 AM, John R. Levine wrote:
>>> We do remember, don't we, that the domain that started this discussion
>>> were shut down by Verisign, the registry, not a registrar?
>
>> interesting that in THIS case the registry just took the action, was
>> the domain registered throug
We do remember, don't we, that the domain that started this discussion
were shut down by Verisign, the registry, not a registrar?
interesting that in THIS case the registry just took the action, was
the domain registered through their registrar arm?
They haven't had a registrar arm since they
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:17 AM, John Levine wrote:
> We do remember, don't we, that the domain that started this discussion
> were shut down by Verisign, the registry, not a registrar?
what's super fun here is that often in conversations with registries
about domains used for malware/spam/etc
I'm not asking them to evade court orders, but rather keep their face
out of my business unless absolutely required. Other major registrars
seem to have a major issue with this.
Jeff
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:17 AM, John Levine wrote:
>>We use OpenSRS and never have these issues. Many of the oth
>We use OpenSRS and never have these issues. Many of the other major
>registrars will freeze domains for whatever reason they choose.
>OpenSRS basically fulfills their duties to ICANN and leaves it alone
>at that. The only domain I have ever seen them get involved with was
>along time ago when some
We use OpenSRS and never have these issues. Many of the other major
registrars will freeze domains for whatever reason they choose.
OpenSRS basically fulfills their duties to ICANN and leaves it alone
at that. The only domain I have ever seen them get involved with was
along time ago when someone s
Has this process matured or is it still a wild-west kind of thing? Last time I
saw this, it was with a LARGE registrar and we had to threaten them with a TRO
before they'd even put their lawyers on the phone. It was a few years ago.
This time the issue is with DOTSTER and they never even bother
16 matches
Mail list logo
