Greetings NANOG,
Was hoping to gain some insight into common practice with using BGP
Communities downstream.
For instance:
We peer with AS100 (example)
AS100 peers with TW Telecom (AS4323).
Since I happen to know that AS100 doesn't sanitize the communities I send
with my routes. I can take
Le mardi 10 mai 2011 à 17:52 -0400, Nick Olsen a écrit :
Greetings NANOG,
Was hoping to gain some insight into common practice with using BGP
Communities downstream.
For instance:
We peer with AS100 (example)
AS100 peers with TW Telecom (AS4323).
Since I happen to know that AS100 doesn't
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 05:52:39PM -0400, Nick Olsen wrote:
Greetings NANOG,
Was hoping to gain some insight into common practice with using BGP
Communities downstream.
For instance:
We peer with AS100 (example)
AS100 peers with TW Telecom (AS4323).
Since I happen to know that AS100
On Tue, 10 May 2011, Nick Olsen wrote:
Was hoping to gain some insight into common practice with using BGP
Communities downstream.
Generally, the transitive BGP attribute you have the most direct control
over is AS_PATH, though it's not impossible for a provider to munge the
AS_PATH on
: Downstream Usage-BGP Communites
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 05:52:39PM -0400, Nick Olsen wrote:
Greetings NANOG,
Was hoping to gain some insight into common practice with using BGP
Communities downstream.
For instance:
We peer with AS100 (example)
AS100 peers with TW Telecom (AS4323).
Since I
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:47:11PM -0400, Nick Olsen wrote:
Ah, Sorry for the confusion.
We have a mutual agreement with AS100 (call it transit or peering) we send
them full routes, They send us full routes.
AS100 is a transit customer of AS4323.
I understand I would be at the mercy of how
6 matches
Mail list logo
