I've found them to be quite sufficient here in the PDX metro area. They
support all L2 tunnels, in particular, QnQ which I require. We have diverse
paths, multiple strands and multi-colored. We are a bit of a special case as
we are serviced by a group that is intended for government and education
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, Holmes,David A wrote:
I do not know of Comcast's Ethernet services specifically, but a general
problem with carrier Ethernet services that are based upon the Metro
Ethernet Forum (MEF) is that PIM-snooping is not implemented for
multicast traffic. The absence of
-
From: Antonio Querubin [mailto:t...@lava.net]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 12:13 PM
To: Holmes,David A
Cc: Brandon Galbraith; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Experiences with Comcast Ethernet/Transit service
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, Holmes,David A wrote:
I do not know of Comcast's Ethernet services
@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Experiences with Comcast Ethernet/Transit service
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, Holmes,David A wrote:
I do not know of Comcast's Ethernet services specifically, but a
general
problem with carrier Ethernet services that are based upon the Metro
Ethernet Forum (MEF) is that PIM
We're looking at using Comcast's (business) transit and private ethernet
services at several client locations and I wanted to see what experiences
others have had regarding this. Off-list replies are preferred.
Thanks,
-brandon
--
Brandon Galbraith
Mobile: 630.400.6992
5 matches
Mail list logo
