Can anyone explain why ATT's UVerse adds significant delay to packets
compared to their ADSL service?
For example, pinging 8.8.8.8 from an ADSL gateway shows a latency of
~10ms. From an UVerse gateway, it's about 40ms. Of the extra 30ms,
about 10ms can be explained by the fact that UVerse last
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 05:11:47PM -0500, Srikanth Sundaresan wrote:
Here are the traceroutes (without the first 3 hops)
(Note: NANOG is not really the right place to troubleshoot everyone's
home connectivity, I'm mostly just posting this as an educational
example of how to do inter-network
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Srikanth Sundaresan srknt...@gmail.com wrote:
Here are the traceroutes (without the first 3 hops)
The U-Verse infrastructure is a bit of a mess when you get closer to
the end subscriber. There will be a few more L3 hops as your packets
egress the metro area
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 15:39 -0500, Srikanth Sundaresan wrote:
Can anyone explain why ATT's UVerse adds significant delay to packets
compared to their ADSL service?
U-Verse is actually the name of two entirely different services - VDSL
and FTTP. This is a typical symptom of stupidity on behalf
4 matches
Mail list logo
