On 17 Mar 2014, at 7:39, John Bond john.b...@icann.org wrote:
Global and Local nodes are very loosely defined terms. However general
consensus of a local node is one that has a desired routing policy which
does not allow the service supernets to propagate globally. As we impose
no policy
alas, our service predates Joe’s marvelous text.
“B” provides its services locally to its upstream ISPs.
We don’t play routing tricks, impose routing policy, or attempt to
influence prefix announcement.
/bill
Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet.
On 17March2014Monday, at 7:17, Joe Abley
On 17 Mar 2014, at 10:27, manning bill bmann...@isi.edu wrote:
alas, our service predates Joe’s marvelous text.
“B” provides its services locally to its upstream ISPs.
We don’t play routing tricks, impose routing policy, or attempt to
influence prefix announcement.
In the taxonomy I just
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:11:40AM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
On 17 Mar 2014, at 10:27, manning bill bmann...@isi.edu wrote:
alas, our service predates Joe’s marvelous text.
“B” provides its services locally to its upstream ISPs.
We don’t play routing tricks, impose routing policy, or
Hello everyone!
It seems like http://www.root-servers.org/index.html has been updated after
quite sometime. Seems like data about local Vs global for many of root
servers nodes is incorrect. E.g for Netnod i root all nodes are marked as
Global nodes. As far as I understand it means that routes
Hi Anurag,
On 16 mrt. 2014, at 10:11, Anurag Bhatia m...@anuragbhatia.com
mailto:m...@anuragbhatia.com wrote:
Hello everyone!
It seems like http://www.root-servers.org/index.html has been updated
after quite sometime.
The root-servers.org http://root-servers.org site has indeed been
6 matches
Mail list logo
