I think the key difference here is that I really just wanted HE to treat my
routes no differently no matter how they learned them. I wanted them to
apply normal BGP routing rules to them.. that is, pick the path with the
shortest AS path.
>From a strictly technical basis, its silly to prefer a
>
> I do understand the reasoning behind preferring customer routes.
> However in the case where a customer of a customer also connects to
> you directly via peering doesn't it make sense to prefer the direct
> connection? or at least not prefer the customer learned routes.
So from my
most networks prefer customers over peers. a few networks don't, some
large. if they changed, customers would scream at them about the newly
overloaded customer circuit.
we are not required to like this :)
randy
On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 at 16:23, Forrest Christian (List Account)
wrote:
>
> I do understand the reasoning behind preferring customer routes.
> However in the case where a customer of a customer also
> connects to you directly via peering doesn't it make sense to prefer
> the direct connection? or
> Google has let you down, 6730 (sunrise) is not 6939 (HE) ;)
>
Oops I should check thing better at the end of the day ..
My bad
On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 at 17:19, Brian Turnbow via NANOG wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >I do understand the reasoning behind preferring customer routes. However
> >in the case where a customer of a customer also connects to you directly via
> >peering doesn't it make sense to prefer the direct connection?
Hi,
>I do understand the reasoning behind preferring customer routes. However in
>the case where a customer of a customer also connects to you directly via
>peering doesn't it make sense to prefer the direct connection? or at >least
>not prefer the customer learned routes.
Business not
t;> From: NANOG On Behalf Of Rubens
>>> Kuhl
>>> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2022 12:36 PM
>>> To: Nanog
>>> Subject: HE.net and BGP Communities
>>>
>>> The last mention I found on NANOG about HE.net and BGP communities for
>>> traffic engineering is from April 2021 and said they provided none.
>>>
>>> Is that still the case a year later ?
>>>
>>>
>>> Rubens
>>>
>> On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 9:39 PM Ryan Hamel
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>> Ryan
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: NANOG On Behalf Of
>>> Rubens Kuhl
>>> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2022 12:36 PM
&g
>I wish they'd add one more that turns off their "prefer routes learned from a
>customer" rule. I'm having to split my blocks in >half and announce them
>that way to get them to send my traffic directly to me through our IX peering
>session as opposed to >one of my transit providers.
>I'd
Jul 24, 2022 at 9:39 PM Ryan Hamel
>>> wrote:
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>> Ryan
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: NANOG On Behalf Of Rubens
>>> Kuhl
>>> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2022 12:36 PM
>>> To: Nanog
>
t; -Original Message-
>> From: NANOG On Behalf Of
>> Rubens Kuhl
>> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2022 12:36 PM
>> To: Nanog
>> Subject: HE.net and BGP Communities
>>
>> The last mention I found on NANOG about HE.net and BGP communities for
>> traffi
They do have BGP communities ... but for black-hole only :-(
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 9:39 PM Ryan Hamel
wrote:
> Yes.
>
> Ryan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG On Behalf Of
> Rubens Kuhl
> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2022 12:36 PM
> To: Nanog
> Subje
Yes.
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Rubens Kuhl
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2022 12:36 PM
To: Nanog
Subject: HE.net and BGP Communities
The last mention I found on NANOG about HE.net and BGP communities for traffic
engineering is from April 2021 and said they provided
The last mention I found on NANOG about HE.net and BGP communities for
traffic engineering is from April 2021 and said they provided none.
Is that still the case a year later ?
Rubens
15 matches
Mail list logo
