I see, thanks for the explanation.
One follow-up question: Why is the designation "6to4" rather than
"IANA"? I would have expected the latter, as 2002::/16---similarly to
the individual parts of 2001::/23---is listed under IANA's IPv6
Special-Purpose Address Registry.
Thanks in advance,
Lar
On Mon, 02 Aug 2021 11:57:54 +0200, Lars Prehn said:
> Is there a reason why the status of 2002::/16 in IANA's IPv6 unicast
> assignments list [1] is ALLOCATED (with '6to4' as designation and the
> note field indicating reservation) rather than RESERVED?
It can probably be moved back to 'reserved
On 2021-08-02 10:57, Lars Prehn wrote:
Hi,
Is there a reason why the status of 2002::/16 in IANA's IPv6 unicast
assignments list [1] is ALLOCATED (with '6to4' as designation and the
note field indicating reservation) rather than RESERVED?
Best regards,
Lars
Perhaps something to do with it be
Hi,
Is there a reason why the status of 2002::/16 in IANA's IPv6 unicast
assignments list [1] is ALLOCATED (with '6to4' as designation and the
note field indicating reservation) rather than RESERVED?
Best regards,
Lars
[1]
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-unicast-address-assignments/i
4 matches
Mail list logo
