I have no problem paying an extra $3/year for my .com IF every domain
speculator must also pay an extra $3 for each of their .coms. Is that
what's happening here?
Yes. The contract very clearly says that everyone pays the same renewal
price to the registry.
Regards,
John Levine,
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 12:46 PM John Levine wrote:
> The impact of this is that if you have a .com domain name, you may
> have to budget as much as an additional $3/yr. Wahoo.
Hi John,
I have no problem paying an extra $3/year for my .com IF every domain
speculator must also pay an extra $3
In article
you write:
>El Reg is more of a tabloid than industry media, but you can read almost
>the same views at domain industry blogs:
>http://domainincite.com/25129-breaking-verisign-pays-icann-20-million-and-gets-to-raise-com-prices-again
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 10:58 PM Keith Medcalf wrote:
>
> On NANOG list , Dan Hollis
> wrote:
>
> >https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/01/07/icann_verisign_fees/
>
> Operator of the dot-com registry, Verisign, has decided to pay DNS
> overseer ICANN $4m a year for the next five years in order to
On NANOG list , Dan Hollis
wrote:
>https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/01/07/icann_verisign_fees/
Operator of the dot-com registry, Verisign, has decided to pay DNS
overseer ICANN $4m a year for the next five years in order to “educate
the wider ICANN community about security threats.”
>98%
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/01/07/icann_verisign_fees/
98% of the comments were opposed.
How many / which companies would have to get onboard in order to get
enough support for an icann alternative?
Is such a thing even feasible?
-Dan
6 matches
Mail list logo
