The idea was to observe and measure an (almost) all IPv4 network and
its management/infrastructure costs, namely the one we got, not an
IPv6 one, before the transition starts to muddy the waters
significantly.
-b
On October 22, 2010 at 18:03 bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com
It occurs to me that there is some pressing need to investigate this
all-IPv6 internet -- motivated by the cost of (not) maintaining IPv4
forever.
Right now we can observe essentially an all-IPv4 internet (99%,
whatever.)
In a very few years, possibly as few as two, the picture might become
revised : 2009-02-05
(now I'm teasing.. .Bill where's your docs on this fantastic new
teknowlogie?)
I found it here:
http://www.ivi2.org/
But the readme is a bit confusing:
http://www.ivi2.org/code/00-ivi0.5-README
Trying to figure out how they map a /70 v6 prefix
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:28:24PM -0400, Barry Shein wrote:
It occurs to me that there is some pressing need to investigate this
all-IPv6 internet -- motivated by the cost of (not) maintaining IPv4
forever.
Right now we can observe essentially an all-IPv4 internet (99%,
whatever.)
--
Message-
From: Christopher Morrow Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 9:49 PM
To: bmanning
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: IPv4 sunset date revised : 2009-02-05
(now I'm teasing.. .Bill where's your docs on this fantastic new
teknowlogie?)
I found it here:
http
From: bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com
ah... but the trick is to only need enough IPv4 in the pool
to dynamically talk to the Internet. Native v6 to Native v6
never has to drop back to the Internet, It uses native v6
paths. So the larger the v6 uptake, the fewer
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:20:45PM -0700, George Bonser wrote:
From: bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com
ah... but the trick is to only need enough IPv4 in the pool
to dynamically talk to the Internet. Native v6 to Native v6
never has to drop back to the Internet, It uses
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 1:37 PM
To: George Bonser
Cc: bmanning
Subject: Re: IPv4 sunset date revised : 2009-02-05
anyone still not paying attention? (read the CERNET2 reports
on the costs of dual-stack...) Native may be your best long
term bet.
--bill
The IPv4 space here was retired in 2009. We love the IVI
translator code. Whats keeping the rest of you?
--bill
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
The IPv4 space here was retired in 2009. We love the IVI
translator code. Whats keeping the rest of you?
Just hazarding a guess:
router# conf t
router(config)# ipv6 ivi enable
router(config)# ^Z
Adrian
On 10/21/2010 10:48 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
not so much - it runs on linux instead of a closed OS.
I think you missed the point. Many are waiting for it to be supported on
their brand of routers. Not everyone has huge numbers of servers sitting
around acting as
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:52:32PM -0500, Jack Bates wrote:
On 10/21/2010 10:48 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
not so much - it runs on linux instead of a closed OS.
I think you missed the point. Many are waiting for it to be supported on
their brand of routers. Not everyone
On Oct 22, 2010, at 12:10 AM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:52:32PM -0500, Jack Bates wrote:
On 10/21/2010 10:48 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
not so much - it runs on linux instead of a closed OS.
I think you missed the point. Many are
(bill is a tease)
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:48 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:40:29AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
The IPv4 space here was retired in 2009. We love the IVI
translator code.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Morrow Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 9:49 PM
To: bmanning
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: IPv4 sunset date revised : 2009-02-05
(now I'm teasing.. .Bill where's your docs on this fantastic new
teknowlogie?)
I found it here:
http://www.ivi2
15 matches
Mail list logo
