Re: IPv6 Implementation and CPE Behavior

> On Jan 11, 2016, at 1:37 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: > > >> On Jan 11, 2016, at 10:23 , James R Cutler >> wrote: >> >>> On Jan 11, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Graham Johnston >>> wrote: >>> >>> Are most CPE devices generally not

IPv6 Implementation and CPE Behavior

Hi nanog, We are little behind in our IPv6 rollout are pushing to make big strides by the end of Q2. We have all of our core network and primary infrastructure dual-stack enabled at this point and our next step will be to move to dual-stack on our CMTSs. For those retail operators that have

Re: IPv6 Implementation and CPE Behavior

hey, Are most CPE devices generally not IPv6 capable in the first place? For those that are capable are they usually still configured with IPv6 disabled, requiring the customer to enable it? For those CPE that are capable and enabled, is there a common configuration such as full blown

Re: IPv6 Implementation and CPE Behavior

> On Jan 11, 2016, at 10:23 , James R Cutler > wrote: > >> On Jan 11, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Graham Johnston >> wrote: >> >> Are most CPE devices generally not IPv6 capable in the first place? For >> those that are capable are they

Re: IPv6 Implementation and CPE Behavior

> On Jan 11, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Graham Johnston > wrote: > > Are most CPE devices generally not IPv6 capable in the first place? For > those that are capable are they usually still configured with IPv6 disabled, > requiring the customer to enable it? For those CPE