On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:21:12 -0700, George B. geor...@gmail.com said:
GB There is a reason for that. First of all, we (my employer) took this
GB as a brief test to simply see how much IPv6 traffic there really was,
GB and who and what would actually attempt to reach us by IPv6. The idea
GB here
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:59:41 -0500, James Harr james.h...@gmail.com said:
JH I noticed that one of our vendors wasn't actually participating when
JH they very publicly put on their home page that they would. So I
JH queried the IPv6 day participation list to see who didn't have 's
JH for
Someone has told me that Microsoft switched off IPv6 for the day. Is that
true? To what extent?
j
--
---
Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
VP
: Re: IPv6 day non-participants
Someone has told me that Microsoft switched off IPv6 for the day. Is
that true? To what extent?
j
--
---
Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC -
http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com
IMHO, it's worse than that. Most sites only added a record for
their website, and frequently didn't for their DNS server. So they
weren't *really* doing a complete IPv6 test, IMHO.
There is a reason for that. First of all, we (my employer) took this
as a brief test to simply see how
On Jun 9, 2011, at 3:03 PM, Joly MacFie wrote:
Someone has told me that Microsoft switched off IPv6 for the day. Is that
true? To what extent?
I think this depends on the division.
their search (bing) folks turned it off.
% host www.bing.com.
www.bing.com is an alias for
I noticed that one of our vendors wasn't actually participating when
they very publicly put on their home page that they would. So I
queried the IPv6 day participation list to see who didn't have 's
for their listed website. It turned out to be around 9.5%
Before you read the list, here's me
ISOC has a red/green dashboard of individual (non)participants:
http://www.worldipv6day.org/participant-websites/index.html
Cheers,
~Chris
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 09:59, James Harr james.h...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed that one of our vendors wasn't actually participating when
they very
The list of TownNews domains participating can be found here:
http://www.townnews365.com/ipv6/
-mjf
-Original Message-
From: James Harr [mailto:james.h...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 12:00 PM
To: nanog
Subject: IPv6 day non-participants
I noticed that one of our vendors
uvaldeleadernews.com
voiceoftheironrange.com
vp-mi.com
wcfcourier.com
wereadnatrona.com
westyellowstonenews.com
winonadailynews.com
yourwestvalley.com
-mjf
-Original Message-
From: James Harr [mailto:james.h...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 12:00 PM
To: nanog
Subject: IPv6 day non
Was participating until we hit a rather nasty load balancer bug that
took out the entire unit if clients with a short MTU connected and it
needed to fragment packets (Citrix Netscaler running latest code). No
fix is available for it yet, so we had to shut it down. Ran for about
9 hours before
I notice that that page currently lists as http://www.bbc.co.uk/ as
unreachable via IPv4 ! ?
j
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Chris Grundemann cgrundem...@gmail.comwrote:
ISOC has a red/green dashboard of individual (non)participants:
The ISOC dashboard that Chris mentions is indeed accurate and up to date
from our perspective. Comcast is definitely an active participant with
our website http://xfinity.comcast.net, which is live with a published
and is IPv6 reachable.
Thanks
--
Chris Griffiths
Comcast Cable
On Jun 8, 2011, at 12:49 PM, George B. wrote:
Was participating until we hit a rather nasty load balancer bug that
took out the entire unit if clients with a short MTU connected and it
needed to fragment packets (Citrix Netscaler running latest code). No
fix is available for it yet, so we
On 6/8/2011 6:18 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Jun 8, 2011, at 12:49 PM, George B. wrote:
Was participating until we hit a rather nasty load balancer bug that
took out the entire unit if clients with a short MTU connected and it
needed to fragment packets (Citrix Netscaler running latest
So if you are using a Netscaler with SLB-PT (IPv6 VIP balancing to
IPv4 servers), the entire LB is subject to stop working until they get
this fixed.
And this is EXACTLY why we needed World IPv6 Day.
Agreed, right on the money !!
Traffic stats may not say a lot yet due to tunnels and lack
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Jorge Amodio jmamo...@gmail.com wrote:
So if you are using a Netscaler with SLB-PT (IPv6 VIP balancing to
IPv4 servers), the entire LB is subject to stop working until they get
this fixed.
And this is EXACTLY why we needed World IPv6 Day.
Agreed, right on the
I dont think ISOC dashboard is updating any more. Google is no longer
advertising but dashboard still shows green and TTLs were short on
those records.
\\
; DiG 9.6.0-APPLE-P2 www.google.com in
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id:
18 matches
Mail list logo
