he staff to evaluate tools for scheduling meetings for future
meetings. The Peering Coordination Forum is open for registration:
https://nanog.org/meetings/nanog70/pcf
Mehmet has submitted a proposed agenda for the Interconnection track as,
which the NANOG Program Committee has to evaluate thr
Scheduling question: I assume this is the slot on the agenda that say:
"NANOG 70 Peering Coordination Forum"
I'm not seeing it on the schedule. Has a lot been assigned?
John Kemp
On 4/17/17 6:03 AM, Bevan Slattery wrote:
> Hi! Love the interconnection track. Great stuff. But
Hi! Love the interconnection track. Great stuff. But I can't help but think
limiting interconnection to the peering/IXP view seems to be looking at
interconnection from the rear view mirror.
I just think that changing the track name from peering/IXP to "Interconnection"
has the o
will have time in this
interconnection track. Unfortunately no graphs, other updates.
Few questions, Seattle is beautiful in summer and I hope to have many of
you in person in beautiful washington state, but for those who can't
travel, should we record / live stream this session? (Historically we
On 02.04.2017 01:59, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> - Once and for all: Are IXP's as dead as some say?
>
The last time I heard "dead" it was spelled out: transit is dead ;-)
Arnold
--
Arnold Nipper
email: arn...@nipper.de
mobile: +49 172 2650958
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
that helps.
Best,
-M<
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Mehmet Akcin <meh...@akcin.net> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As promised few months ago publically I have volunteered to bring together
> content to have Peering Track back to agenda. Now called "Interconnection
> T
Hello,
As promised few months ago publically I have volunteered to bring together
content to have Peering Track back to agenda. Now called "Interconnection
Track"
I would like to ask those who will attend, have attended in person in the
past or those who have organized similar event
7 matches
Mail list logo
