On 2014-01-16, at 18:21, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> On 2014-01-16 23:11, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>> On 16/01/2014 21:22, Jon Lewis wrote:
>>> Also, at least of the ones I've dealt with, there is no verification of
>>> records as they're entered.
>>
>> on the RIPE IRRDB, there is validation, so you can
On 2014-01-16 23:11, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 16/01/2014 21:22, Jon Lewis wrote:
>> Also, at least of the ones I've dealt with, there is no verification of
>> records as they're entered.
>
> on the RIPE IRRDB, there is validation, so you can't just go in and
> register route: objects for someone
On 16/01/2014 21:22, Jon Lewis wrote:
> Also, at least of the ones I've dealt with, there is no verification of
> records as they're entered.
on the RIPE IRRDB, there is validation, so you can't just go in and
register route: objects for someone else's allocations or assignments. Not
sure about t
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Eric Krichbaum wrote:
I 100% agree with Nick. But, in dealing with Level3, you need Level3
Members Remarks in your objects to deal with multiple registries etc.
They have an ok system that is a nightmare to pull from different
datasources with them and they've churned the
courtneysm...@comcast.net wrote the following on 1/16/2014 12:26 PM:
On 16/01/2014 14:32, Blake Hudson wrote:
Thanks for the responses, these objects are all older. However, none of
them are stale or from previous owners, allocations, etc. Each of these
objects were posted to their respective I
On 16/01/2014 14:32, Blake Hudson wrote:
> Thanks for the responses, these objects are all older. However, none of
> them are stale or from previous owners, allocations, etc. Each of these
> objects were posted to their respective IRR's after the IP space was
> allocated to us. This leads me t
On 16/01/2014 14:32, Blake Hudson wrote:
> Thanks for the responses, these objects are all older. However, none of
> them are stale or from previous owners, allocations, etc. Each of these
> objects were posted to their respective IRR's after the IP space was
> allocated to us. This leads me to bel
n...@foobar.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 3:31 PM
To: Blake Hudson; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Internet Routing Registries - RADb, etc
On 15/01/2014 21:22, Blake Hudson wrote:
I have emailed Level3 about the incorrect entries in their IRR with no
response. I have also emailed Cogent about
Blake,
If you find that an RADb maintainer is unresponsive about removing
stale/incorrect objects in the RADb, we will review your request
and can remove the objects in question.
Regards,
Larry Blunk
Merit
- Original Message -
> Can someone provide a little guidance on RADb (a
o: Blake Hudson; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Internet Routing Registries - RADb, etc
On 15/01/2014 21:22, Blake Hudson wrote:
> I have emailed Level3 about the incorrect entries in their IRR with no
> response. I have also emailed Cogent about their incorrect entry in
> RADb, also with no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Or perhaps this indicates that no one pays attention to what is in the
RAdb, and therefore makes a statement about the RAdb itself?
No idea myself...
- - ferg
On 1/15/2014 1:22 PM, Blake Hudson wrote:
> Can someone provide a little guidance on RA
On 15/01/2014 21:22, Blake Hudson wrote:
> I have emailed Level3 about the incorrect entries in their IRR with no
> response. I have also emailed Cogent about their incorrect entry in RADb,
> also with no response.
>
> Should I be concerned about these entries? Do these entries give someone
> the
Can someone provide a little guidance on RADb (and other IRRs)?
Our organization is not a customer of any IRRs, but our ARIN IP
allocation is registered in RADb and Level3's IRR. The majority of these
entries are incorrect and list other AS#'s (AS's that have never been
authorized to announce
13 matches
Mail list logo
