Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]

2013-03-25 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 11:28:07 -0700, Owen DeLong said: A reliable cost-effective means for FTL signaling is a hard problem without a known solution. Agreed. An idiot-proof simple BGP configuration is a well known solution. Automating it would be relatively simple if there were the will to do

Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]

2013-03-25 Thread Leo Bicknell
In a message written on Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 12:54:18PM -0400, John Curran wrote: I believe that the percentage which _expects_ unabridged connectivity today is quite high, but that does not necessarily mean actual _demand_ (i.e. folks who go out and make the necessary arrangements despite

Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]

2013-03-24 Thread joel jaeggli
On 3/23/13 9:13 PM, Matt Palmer wrote: On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 07:47:12PM -0700, Kyle Creyts wrote: You do realize that there are quite a few people (home broadband subscribers?) who just go do something else when their internet goes down, right? [...] Will they really demand ubiquitous,

Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]

2013-03-24 Thread William Herrin
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Kyle Creyts kyle.cre...@gmail.com wrote: Will they really demand ubiquitous, unabridged connectivity? When? When the older generation that considers the Internet a side show dies off. When your grandparents' power went out, they broke out candles and kerosene

Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]

2013-03-24 Thread George Herbert
On Mar 23, 2013, at 7:47 PM, Kyle Creyts kyle.cre...@gmail.com wrote: Will they really demand ubiquitous, unabridged connectivity? Let's back up. End users do not as a rule* have persistent inbound connections. If they have DSL and a Cable Modem they can switch manually (or with a

Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]

2013-03-24 Thread John Curran
On Mar 24, 2013, at 12:06 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote: ... For most folks under 30 and many who are older, Internet isn't a side show, it's a way of life. An outage is like a power failure or the car going kaput: a major disruption to life's flow. Yes, this is increasingly the

Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]

2013-03-24 Thread Kyle Creyts
As an under-30, working in the industry, I have to say, when the power goes out at home for a few days, we pull out the camping gear. When our cable-based internet goes out, our life changes hardly at all. We go for a walk, or hike, do the things we would normally. I can imagine that an outage of

Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]

2013-03-24 Thread Owen DeLong
I assume those people will not bother with any attempt to multihome in any form. They are not, therefore, part of what is being discussed here. Owen On Mar 23, 2013, at 19:47 , Kyle Creyts kyle.cre...@gmail.com wrote: You do realize that there are quite a few people (home broadband

Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]

2013-03-23 Thread Owen DeLong
On Mar 22, 2013, at 15:44 , valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:16:57 -0500, Owen DeLong said: On Mar 20, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote: Based on the average clue of your average residential subscriber (anyone here need not apply) I'd say that's a

Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]

2013-03-23 Thread Jimmy Hess
On 3/23/13, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote: A reliable cost-effective means for FTL signaling is a hard problem without a known solution. Faster than light signalling is not merely a hard problem. Special relativity doesn't provide that information may travel faster than the maximum speed C.

Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]

2013-03-23 Thread William Herrin
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:44 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:16:57 -0500, Owen DeLong said: On Mar 20, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote: Based on the average clue of your average residential subscriber (anyone here need not apply) I'd say

Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]

2013-03-23 Thread Owen DeLong
On Mar 23, 2013, at 12:12 , Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote: On 3/23/13, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote: A reliable cost-effective means for FTL signaling is a hard problem without a known solution. Faster than light signalling is not merely a hard problem. Special relativity

Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]

2013-03-23 Thread Kyle Creyts
You do realize that there are quite a few people (home broadband subscribers?) who just go do something else when their internet goes down, right? There are people who don't understand the difference between a site being slow and packet-loss. For many of these people, losing internet service

Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]

2013-03-22 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:16:57 -0500, Owen DeLong said: On Mar 20, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote: Based on the average clue of your average residential subscriber (anyone here need not apply) I'd say that's a good thing. If BGP were plug-and-play automated with

Re: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]

2013-03-22 Thread Jimmy Hess
On 3/20/13, John Curran jcur...@istaff.org wrote: On Mar 20, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote: However, if there were motivation on the provider side, automated BGP configuration could enable consumers to attach to multiple providers and actually reduce support calls