Re: Juniper MX10 and dual stack BGP

2013-01-30 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2013-01-30 21:06 -0500), David Miller wrote: > According to Juniper, the MX uses separate memory for v4 and v6. Where do they state this? MX is ambiguous, what matters is linecard HW. > The numbers that I have seen for MX80 are: I.e. trio. No. Trio uses flat RLDRAM, and any IPv6 route insta

Re: Juniper MX10 and dual stack BGP

2013-01-30 Thread David Miller
On 1/30/2013 5:16 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Christopher Rogers wrote: > >> Does anyone have any sort of performance numbers for the jnpr MX10 series >> running dual stack ipv4/ipv6? I'm specifically interested in how many >> BGP >> prefixes it can handle in dual stack

Re: Juniper MX10 and dual stack BGP

2013-01-30 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Christopher Rogers wrote: Does anyone have any sort of performance numbers for the jnpr MX10 series running dual stack ipv4/ipv6? I'm specifically interested in how many BGP prefixes it can handle in dual stacked mode. I've got an environment currently taking 4 full ipv4 t

Juniper MX10 and dual stack BGP

2013-01-30 Thread Christopher Rogers
Does anyone have any sort of performance numbers for the jnpr MX10 series running dual stack ipv4/ipv6? I'm specifically interested in how many BGP prefixes it can handle in dual stacked mode. I've got an environment currently taking 4 full ipv4 tables and a smattering of prefixes coming from a p