Re: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

2020-10-21 Thread Sebastian Wiesinger
* Forrest Christian (List Account) [2020-10-08 11:39]: > I've done a bit of googling and am either finding stuff that is largely > Cisco-specific or which is generic - all of which I'm rather familiar with > based on my past history. Is there anything I should worry about which is >

RE: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

2020-10-13 Thread Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG
2020 11:05 AM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP > Importance: Low > > > On 08/10/2020 11:37, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: > > Is there anything I should worry about which is Juniper-specific? > > JUNOS default A

RE: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

2020-10-12 Thread adamv0025
s@nanog.org> On Behalf Of > Chriztoffer Hansen > Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2020 11:05 AM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP > Importance: Low > > > On 08/10/2020 11:37, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: > > Is th

RE: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

2020-10-10 Thread aaron1
Thanks for setting me straight. I had heard that there was some new stuff with Linux hypervisors or something like that…. So I misspoke. Appreciate y’all -Aaron

Re: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

2020-10-09 Thread Eric Kuhnke
I guess he never saw a Juniper M40, it's literally an i686/x86 32-bit motherboard for the routine engine, glued to a chassis with linecards containing custom ASICs and optics. As I recall it was a moderate speed Pentium 2 with some average amount of RAM and a 2.5" 44pin ATA66 laptop hard drive.

RE: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

2020-10-09 Thread t...@pelican.org
On Thursday, 8 October, 2020 10:37, "Forrest Christian (List Account)" said: > I've done a bit of googling and am either finding stuff that is largely > Cisco-specific or which is generic - all of which I'm rather familiar with > based on my past history. Is there anything I should worry

Re: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

2020-10-09 Thread David Kotlerewsky
Google around for Junos Evolution. Junos is going native Linux. From: NANOG on behalf of Matt Harris Date: Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 4:15 PM To: Chris Boyd Cc: nanog list Subject: Re: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP Matt Harris​ | Infrastructure Lead Engineer 816‑256

Re: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

2020-10-09 Thread Paschal Masha
Above all, JUNOS makes sense when configuring, you literally the software gives you the feel of talking to the device. If your brain is programmed to be logically then all pieces and modes easily come to life and adaptation becomes a zero hustle. *Paschal Masha* Lead Network Engineer 6x7

Re: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

2020-10-09 Thread Alain Hebert
    Yeah, it changes.     They started with FreeBSD 4.x + their patches, then moved it inside a hardened Linux for virtualization functions (watch closely the boot sequence).     uname returns         MX960 - FreeBSD amd64         QFX 5100 - JUNOS i386 (build tag show indication its

RE: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

2020-10-08 Thread aaron1
Right, it's been freebsd forever as I understand it, but I thought there had been some more recent involvement with linux, which is why I said that. I'm not an authority on it though. https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/topic-map/vm-host-o verview.html -Aaron

Re: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

2020-10-08 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Matt Harris said: > There's no Linux going on in Junos itself as far as I know, however Juniper > does utilize Wind River Linux as an intermediary virtualization step for > some of their virtualized products like the vSRX. Most (if not all) of the current routing engines run

Re: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

2020-10-08 Thread Ryan Hamel
There is linux happening in some devices. https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/evo-overview.html Ryan On Thu, Oct 8, 2020, 4:16 PM Matt Harris wrote: > Matt Harris​ > | Infrastructure Lead Engineer > 816‑256‑5446 > | Direct > Looking for something? > *Helpdesk

Re: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

2020-10-08 Thread Matt Harris
Matt Harris|Infrastructure Lead Engineer 816-256-5446|Direct Looking for something? Helpdesk Portal|Email Support|Billing Portal We build and deliver end-to-end IT solutions. On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 5:51 PM Chris Boyd wrote: > > > > On Oct 8, 2020, at 10:55 AM, wrote: > > > > JunOS is so linux

Re: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

2020-10-08 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
I will say that so far I'm finding JunOS and the Juniper documentation to be a welcome change. In my other life I write networking/IoT code and have done my fair share of unix (linux, freebsd, sunos, etc.) administration over the years. As a result, JunOS is feeling more natural than some

Re: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

2020-10-08 Thread Chris Boyd
> On Oct 8, 2020, at 10:55 AM, wrote: > > JunOS is so linux based Um, my MX-204 says FreeBSD amd64.

RE: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

2020-10-08 Thread aaron1
Typos, sorry… Meant …fxpc process… Meant …now 540

RE: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

2020-10-08 Thread aaron1
I just remembered another one I use the heck out of…. Show whateverwhatever | refresh 1 Love it Or refresh 30 (whatever time you want) It’s so nice to be able to take hands off keyboard and know exactly when something changes in that show command…. Piping to “refresh” and a timer

RE: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

2020-10-08 Thread aaron1
To: nanog list Subject: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP After nearly 30 years of being a cisco shop, I'm working on configuring our first pair of Juniper MX204's to replace our current provider-edge cisco. I've worked through enough of the Juniper documentation/books to have

Re: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

2020-10-08 Thread Casey Russell via NANOG
Forrest, Between Jason and Justin, (and now others probably) they've captured what I was already typing. Basically, that as soon as you create a loopback interface (with a L3 IP) you need to start planning your firewall filter for it. Most of it is as simple as creating filters for SSH and

Re: Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

2020-10-08 Thread Justin Oeder
If you are an OSPF shop, Cisco AD is 110 for internal and external routes. Juniper is 10 for internal and 150 for external. This can be changed via an export (maybe import) policy on the OSPF protocol. There is no 'network' statement in the Junos world. There are a few different ways to solve

Re: [EXTERNAL] Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

2020-10-08 Thread Pierre LANCASTRE
; *To:* nanog list > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP > > > > > > After nearly 30 years of being a cisco shop, I'm working on configuring > our first pair of Juniper MX204's to replace our current provider-edge > cisco. > > > >

RE: [EXTERNAL] Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

2020-10-08 Thread Mann, Jason via NANOG
To: nanog list Subject: [EXTERNAL] Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP After nearly 30 years of being a cisco shop, I'm working on configuring our first pair of Juniper MX204's to replace our current provider-edge cisco. I've worked through enough of the Juniper documentation/books

Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

2020-10-08 Thread Chriztoffer Hansen
On 08/10/2020 11:37, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: > Is there anything I should worry about > which is Juniper-specific? JUNOS default ARP timeout: 20 min. If you connect to IXP's. Recommended ARP timeout: 4 hours.

Juniper configuration recommendations/BCP

2020-10-08 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
After nearly 30 years of being a cisco shop, I'm working on configuring our first pair of Juniper MX204's to replace our current provider-edge cisco. I've worked through enough of the Juniper documentation/books to have a fairly good handle on how to configure these, but I wanted to check with