If you want to garner discussion or support for your draft RFC, it's
probably better to have that conversation via the appropriate IETF
channels.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 2:43 PM Abraham Y. Chen wrote:
> Hi, Fred:
>
> 0)Thank you for a set of references.
>
> 1)We cited only one IETF Draft
Hi, Fred:
0) Thank you for a set of references.
1) We cited only one IETF Draft (Wilson, et al.) among them, because
it was the first and only one that clearly stated its limitation
(Section 2. Caveats of Use). More importantly, it was written by three
top APNIC officials. Later efforts
2 matches
Mail list logo
