Re: NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life

2011-01-19 Thread Mikhail Strizhov
Hi, I didn't use NAT-PT, but have lot of experience with NAT64/DNS64. We've deployed NAT64 with DNS64 in our test lab with last Fedora linux workstations , so far, it works fine. -- Sincerely, Mikhail Strizhov Email: striz...@netsec.colostate.edu On 01/

Re: NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life

2011-01-19 Thread Cameron Byrne
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:18 AM, jarod smith wrote: > Although it would seem that double-stack is still the preferred method of > linux > distribution, I want my next deployed in IPv6 only. > For linux there is NAT-PT tomicki and NAT64 Viagenie. > > I don't have Cisco equipment although I'd like

Re: NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life

2011-01-19 Thread jarod smith
Thanks for your reply. In summary it's not possible to deployed IPv6 only if I want to access the whole internet :) On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:18 AM, jarod smith wrote: > Although it would seem that double-stack is still the preferred method of > linux > distribution, I want my next deployed

Re: NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life

2011-01-19 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, jarod smith wrote: Are some of you have installed one of these two implementations in production on recent versions of linux? Is it stable, secure, ... ? Not in production, but we've installed it for testing. We immediately ran into problems that was MTU related where via

NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life

2011-01-19 Thread jarod smith
Although it would seem that double-stack is still the preferred method of linux distribution, I want my next deployed in IPv6 only. For linux there is NAT-PT tomicki and NAT64 Viagenie. I don't have Cisco equipment although I'd like tested their NAT-PT, even if it's obsolete. Are some of you have