Nathan Eisenberg nat...@atlasnetworks.us wrote:
None of these jokes are class-e.
I considered offering 172.24.0.0/14, in an attempt at in-CIDR humor.
On 05/31/12 01:52, Robert Bonomi wrote:
I considered offering 172.24.0.0/14, in an attempt at in-CIDR humor.
Can we be arrested for in-CIDR trading?
--
Mr. Flibble
King of the Potato People
Hello,
On Wed, 30 May 2012 21:43:41 -0500
STARNES, CURTIS curtis.star...@granburyisd.org wrote:
I guess I will just have to settle for selling my 224.0.0.0/24 :-
After checking some machines, it seems that 127.0.0.1/8 can be sold multiple
times, as it is fully re-usable.
Any bonus for
I could probably gin up some cheap black market Class F's ... I'll
match and beat any advertised or unadvertised route.
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1365.txt
Ted
On 05/31/12 01:52, Robert Bonomi wrote:
I considered offering 172.24.0.0/14, in an attempt at in-CIDR humor.
Can we be
On 30 May 2012 05:15, Scott Howard sc...@doc.net.au wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Timothy McGinnis mc...@isc.org wrote:
Dear Unnamed person at The SpaceMarket,
He appears to not be unnamed. Gmail links the user to the Google+
profile
Anyone who spams, regardless of how great their product is, does not get my
business nor the business of anyone else who will listen to me.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Howard [mailto:sc...@doc.net.au]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 12:16 AM
To: Timothy McGinnis
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
There are five registered STLS facilitators -
https://www.arin.net/resources/transfer_listing/facilitator_list.html
SpaceMarket is not one of them. I am confounded about why anyone would select a
broker who has not taken the basic step of registering with the RIR. Of course,
the typos and
Can I trade in my class A? (10/8)
On 05/29/12 17:43, The SpaceMarket wrote:
IPv4 is not going away as quickly as many would like. Most realistic
observations show IPv4 will still be the numbering scheme most widely
deployed and utilized for the next decade. This due mainly to peers
and
I thought the 10.0.0.0/8 was mine.
I was going to sell some of it!
Curtis
-Original Message-
From: Robert Hajime Lanning [mailto:lann...@lanning.cc]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 5:51 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Need (to acquire or sell) IPv4? Come to SpaceMarket.
Can I
I guess I will just have to settle for selling my 224.0.0.0/24 :-
-Original Message-
From: STARNES, CURTIS [mailto:curtis.star...@granburyisd.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 9:41 PM
To: 'lann...@lanning.cc'; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Need (to acquire or sell) IPv4? Come to
None of these jokes are class-e.
-Original Message-
From: STARNES, CURTIS [mailto:curtis.star...@granburyisd.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 7:44 PM
To: STARNES, CURTIS; 'lann...@lanning.cc'; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Need (to acquire or sell) IPv4? Come to SpaceMarket.
I guess I
Lol
Thanks,
Ameen Pishdadi
On May 30, 2012, at 10:07 PM, Nathan Eisenberg nat...@atlasnetworks.us wrote:
None of these jokes are class-e.
-Original Message-
From: STARNES, CURTIS [mailto:curtis.star...@granburyisd.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 7:44 PM
To: STARNES, CURTIS;
IPv4 is not going away as quickly as many would like. Most realistic
observations show IPv4 will still be the numbering scheme most widely
deployed and utilized for the next decade. This due mainly to peers
and providers whom have not deployed IPv6 and ISP end-users, which
continue to use,
Dear Unnamed person at The SpaceMarket,
This list has an Acceptable Use Policy at:
http://www.nanog.org/mailinglist/
Acceptable Use Policy
1. Discussion will focus on Internet operational and technical issues
as described in the charter of NANOG.
Likely transfers made in this way may not be recordable with the applicable
RIRs and may violate the RIR policies.
If you care about your addresses being properly registered in whois to avoid
unnecessary hassles around being able to route them, I highly recommend making
sure that you are
Of all the people you pick to spam you picked NANOG, maybe you should hit up
bugtraq next
On May 29, 2012, at 7:16 PM, Timothy McGinnis mc...@isc.org wrote:
Dear Unnamed person at The SpaceMarket,
This list has an Acceptable Use Policy at:
http://www.nanog.org/mailinglist/
Acceptable
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
Likely transfers made in this way may not be recordable with the applicable
RIRs and may violate the RIR policies.
If you care about your addresses being properly registered in whois to avoid
unnecessary hassles around
Nice Tuesday-Evening humor!
...an escrow-agent..and 150k addresses..note Currently(as of this writing)
No doubt the next post will have 250k free.
./Randy
To: nanog@nanog.org, nanog-annou...@nanog.org
Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2012, 5:43 PM
IPv4 is not going away as quickly as
many would like.
On May 29, 2012, at 6:38 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
Likely transfers made in this way may not be recordable with the applicable
RIRs and may violate the RIR policies.
If you care about your addresses being properly
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Timothy McGinnis mc...@isc.org wrote:
Dear Unnamed person at The SpaceMarket,
He appears to not be unnamed. Gmail links the user to the Google+
profile https://plus.google.com/116655492141266828122 under the name Dan
Cooper, and with a photo of another Dan
20 matches
Mail list logo
