RE: Not operational, but related to the attendees in Philly

2011-10-06 Thread Jon Lewis
tsons.org] Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 4:58 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Not operational, but related to the attendees in Philly I'm getting a rash of emails (as are some of my colleagues at work that are attending in Philly) from vendors that act like they know me, and just want to "h

Re: Not operational, but related to the attendees in Philly

2011-10-06 Thread Randy Carpenter
I have been getting some from vendors that already have my email, and/or already have a relationship with. Nothing from someone I've never dealt with before. If that is what you are getting, then that is pretty slimy. -Randy - Original Message - > I'm getting a rash of emails (as are

Re: Not operational, but related to the attendees in Philly

2011-10-06 Thread Brett Watson
On Oct 6, 2011, at 6:11 PM, John van Oppen wrote: > That does not seem to be unique to nanog. Oh I know, it's just never happened to me until this nanog, and I've been attending off/on since '94. (Ok, I probably got a few here and there). I just need to get older and more crotchety-er like Rand

RE: Not operational, but related to the attendees in Philly

2011-10-06 Thread John van Oppen
That does not seem to be unique to nanog. -Original Message- From: Brett Watson [mailto:br...@the-watsons.org] Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 4:58 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Not operational, but related to the attendees in Philly I'm getting a rash of emails (as are some

Not operational, but related to the attendees in Philly

2011-10-06 Thread Brett Watson
I'm getting a rash of emails (as are some of my colleagues at work that are attending in Philly) from vendors that act like they know me, and just want to "have a drink and catch up while in Philly". Just me, or are others seeing an increase in spam from vendors that will be there? -b