Clearly, someone has decided to shoot at me specifically, since this
latest spam supposedly from me:
=
Received: from lpb01.clearspring.com ([206.165.250.240]
helo=lpb01-a.clearspring.local)
by sc1.nanog.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80 (FreeBSD))
(envelope-from em...@addthis.com) id
Jay, you need to have SPF records for your domain. This will prevent the
spoofing you are seeing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework
$ dig @8.8.8.8 baylink.com TXT
; DiG 9.8.3-P1 @8.8.8.8 baylink.com TXT
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER-
- Original Message -
From: Sean Lazar kn...@toaster.net
Jay, you need to have SPF records for your domain. This will prevent
the spoofing you are seeing.
I should in fact.
But am I incorrect in thinking that since the envelope address *was not
actually forged*, they wouldn't help
On 2/11/2013 4:39 PM, Sean Lazar wrote:
Jay, you need to have SPF records for your domain. This will prevent the
spoofing you are seeing.
yep, while the purpose and effectiveness of SPF records are generally
VERY overrated... yet for a situation like this, an SPF record is VERY
valuable and it
An SPF record will probably only add value if the receiving mail server for
the nanog list uses them to restrict allowed senders for the domain.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Rob McEwen r...@invaluement.com wrote:
On 2/11/2013 4:39 PM, Sean Lazar wrote:
Jay, you need to have SPF records
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 01:39:18PM -0800, Sean Lazar wrote:
Jay, you need to have SPF records for your domain. This will prevent the
spoofing you are seeing.
(a) SPF is just about entirely worthless and (b) if someone really has
it in for Jay and has at least minimal competence, it won't stop
6 matches
Mail list logo
