These are being implemented in production on many a bank network...so yes,
they are plenty good enough. You will obviously need to test them in a lab
to make sure the features you need to implement don't have any bugs that
need to be addressed first. Overall I've had good experiences with them
th
Hi,
Hardware is really nice.
Backplane, buffers, just basically “pumping” bandwidth. It’s really good.
However, mlag can show some bugs when having only 1 interface in an MLAG (only
1 side) they had issues with the ifindex numbering in software.
There were OSPF configuration options missing, etc
Tom,
Could you expand further on this?
On 11/25/2015 07:29 AM, Tom Hill wrote:
And in relation to Brocade: I'd feel very uncomfortable throwing any
*new* money at MLXe, CER or CES. Strategy for those families seems to
have fallen off of a cliff.
On 24/11/15 21:16, dco...@hammerfiber.com wrote:
> A 7606-S can be purchased refurbished for like 90% off list price. The
> market is seriously glutted with them.
Not sure the OP was talking about 7600s. They're mostly End-of-Life, and
not in any way suited to the OP's requirements (MLAG missing,
I love the MLXe as a platform. Especially for a campus style switch.
Also Cisco really isn't expensive. Not for this type of application.
A 7606-S can be purchased refurbished for like 90% off list price.
The market is seriously glutted with them.
Quoting Josh Reynolds :
Have you look
Have you looked at the brocade MLXe line?
On Nov 24, 2015 12:05 PM, "David Hubbard"
wrote:
> Curious if anyone's used the 7280 and wants to share their experience?
> I'm looking at it primarily for three reasons, MLAG (i.e. multi-chassis
> LACP), large ARP/MAC table (256k entries) and large IPv6
Curious if anyone's used the 7280 and wants to share their experience?
I'm looking at it primarily for three reasons, MLAG (i.e. multi-chassis
LACP), large ARP/MAC table (256k entries) and large IPv6 neighbor table
(256k entries). For the table sizes we would like out of one pair of
switches, we'd
7 matches
Mail list logo
