broad patent on IPv6?
Nah what you describe is a different invention. Someone probably already
has a patent on that.
The browser will do a DNS lookup on slashdot.org and then cache that -
forever (or until you restart the browser). Yes it will ignore the TTL (apps
don't get the TTL at all, so
I was recently reading a few IPv6 patent, and happened upon on developed by
Wesley E. George, Time Warner Cable Inc. on the topic of Use of dns
information as trigger for dynamic ipv4 address allocation.
It seems to impact the allocation of the IPv4 IPv6 address for the
gateway router,
http://www.google.com/patents/US20130254423
Sorry missed the link.
Joe Klein
Inveniam viam aut faciam
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Joe Klein jskl...@gmail.com wrote:
I was recently reading a few IPv6 patent, and happened upon on developed
by Wesley E. George, Time Warner Cable Inc.
No 99% of the text is noise. Read the claims and notice the limitations:
the patent is about a CPE with IPv6 without IPv4 that somehow acquires IPv4
as soon something does a DNS lookup that results in a reply without .
It is a stupid idea if you ask me, so the patent is worthless.
Regards,
Hi,
It is a stupid idea if you ask me,
..and thus, based on most of the current technology patents out there,
perfectly patentable.
dont worry, the rest of the internet will probably need something like this in
the future...
and whats happened here is some coffee-room tech chat or water
Nah what you describe is a different invention. Someone probably already
has a patent on that.
The browser will do a DNS lookup on slashdot.org and then cache that -
forever (or until you restart the browser). Yes it will ignore the TTL
(apps don't get the TTL at all, so apps don't know). Same
This is actually a good idea. Roll out an IPV6 only network and only pass
out an IPV4 address if it's needed based on actual traffic.
On Jul 13, 2015 11:27 AM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
In article CAP032TteiL3=k=
vs-kedgu276fwgxqn1j9jmorlq8sw4xpe...@mail.gmail.com you write:
The point is you'd already have a 192 address or something, and it
would only grab the external address for a short duration for use as
an external PAT address, thus oversubscribing the ip4 pool to users
who need it (based on dns). Its still pretty broken, but less broken
than you describe.
On
Balder,
That may well be the subject of one of the other patents. Also, there is no
requirement under US patent law to build a prototype. It just has to be
possible for one usually skilled in the art to construct one from the content
of the patent. Also, most patents are not for a complete
In article CAP032TteiL3=k=vs-kedgu276fwgxqn1j9jmorlq8sw4xpe...@mail.gmail.com
you write:
http://www.google.com/patents/US20130254423
This is not a patent. It is a patent application. Most applications
do not turn into patents, or at least not with all of the claims
included.
If you look at
Too bad it won't actually work. I type Slashdot.org in my browser. The web
browser does DNS lookup. The CPE notices there is only an A record
available and boots the IPv4 stack. However there is no way to push an IPv4
configuration to my computer. DHCP is pull not push. Even if there was, the
web
Hi,
This is actually a good idea. Roll out an IPV6 only network and only pass
out an IPV4 address if it's needed based on actual traffic.
yes...shame someones applied for a patent on that! ;-)
alan
Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: Baldur Norddahl baldur.nordd...@gmail.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 10:54:49 AM
Subject: Re: Overlay broad patent on IPv6?
Too bad it won't
13 matches
Mail list logo
