Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos

2011-09-06 Thread Positively Optimistic
Greetings We have acquired a new client that has 98 remote endpoints. At each site there is a need for 4 ip telephones and two vpn tunnels back to two separate datacenters. (1 voice, 1 citrix farm). The sites don't talk to each other, just to the two data centers. Does anyone have a

RE: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos

2011-09-06 Thread Brandon Kim
Yes, a SonicWALL NSA 240 has 8 interfaces built in This sounds like a very fun project Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 08:49:13 -0500 Subject: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos From: positivelyoptimis...@gmail.com To: nanog@nanog.org Greetings We have acquired a new client that has 98

Re: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos

2011-09-06 Thread Brant I. Stevens
can share more. -Brant On 9/6/11 10:19 AM, Brandon Kim brandon@brandontek.com wrote: Yes, a SonicWALL NSA 240 has 8 interfaces built in This sounds like a very fun project Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 08:49:13 -0500 Subject: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos From: positivelyoptimis

Re: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos

2011-09-06 Thread Seth Mos
On 6-9-2011 15:49, Positively Optimistic wrote: Greetings Does anyone have a suggestion for a single piece of hardware that would support 8 or less Ethernet interfaces and the two vpn tunnels ? Single piece of hardware, no. If 2, then yes. A PCengines Alix 2D3 with pfSense/m0n0wall and

Re: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos

2011-09-06 Thread -Hammer-
CheckPoint Series 80 has 10 ports. I think there is a Juniper option as well. -Hammer- I was a normal American nerd -Jack Herer On 09/06/2011 09:36 AM, Seth Mos wrote: On 6-9-2011 15:49, Positively Optimistic wrote: Greetings Does anyone have a suggestion for a single piece of hardware

Re: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos

2011-09-06 Thread Jason LeBlanc
...@networking-architecture.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 10:26 AM To: Brandon Kim; positivelyoptimis...@gmail.com; nanog group Subject: Re: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos I would go with Cisco's DMVPN, and its multiple endpoint offerings. A 19xx router sounds like it would meet your needs

RE: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos

2011-09-06 Thread Ryan Finnesey
DMVPN would only work with 100% cisco hardware right? -Original Message- From: Brant I. Stevens [mailto:bra...@networking-architecture.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 10:26 AM To: Brandon Kim; positivelyoptimis...@gmail.com; nanog group Subject: Re: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos

Re: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos

2011-09-06 Thread Garrett Skjelstad
. Stevens [mailto:bra...@networking-architecture.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 10:26 AM To: Brandon Kim; positivelyoptimis...@gmail.com; nanog group Subject: Re: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos I would go with Cisco's DMVPN, and its multiple endpoint offerings. A 19xx router sounds like

RE: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos

2011-09-06 Thread Dylan Ebner
: Garrett Skjelstad [mailto:garr...@skjelstad.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 12:34 PM To: Ryan Finnesey Cc: nanoggroup Subject: Re: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos Yes, but look in 891s at the remotes, the 19xx are too expensive for only 4 devices Just my 2c Sent from my iPhone On Sep

Re: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos

2011-09-06 Thread Brant I. Stevens
To: Brandon Kim; positivelyoptimis...@gmail.com; nanog group Subject: Re: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos I would go with Cisco's DMVPN, and its multiple endpoint offerings. A 19xx router sounds like it would meet your needs for the remotes. Spoke-to-Spoke tunnels are created on-demand, can use

RE: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos

2011-09-06 Thread Dylan Ebner
it does. The older 87x only had a 4 port. The new 89x are the replacement for the 181x series. Dylan -Original Message- From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:se...@rollernet.us] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 1:17 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos On 9/6/11

Re: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos

2011-09-06 Thread Brant I. Stevens
] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 1:17 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos On 9/6/11 11:10 AM, Brant I. Stevens wrote: I'd say the 89x platform is the way to go if 8 ports weren't needed. Correct me if i am wrong... I believe the 89x have a built-in 8 port