Re: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol (Re: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day)

2011-06-06 Thread Jeroen van Aart
Owen DeLong wrote: FIrst I've heard of such a thing. The original organizers of W6D have zero motivation to try such a thing and I can't imagine why they would even consider it for more than a picosecond. It'd be a great way to get a point across. ;-) --

Re: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol (Re: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day)

2011-06-06 Thread Owen DeLong
On Jun 6, 2011, at 1:53 AM, Jeroen van Aart wrote: Owen DeLong wrote: FIrst I've heard of such a thing. The original organizers of W6D have zero motivation to try such a thing and I can't imagine why they would even consider it for more than a picosecond. It'd be a great way to get a

Re: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol (Re: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day)

2011-06-03 Thread Jeroen Massar
On 2011-Jun-03 16:13, Cameron Byrne wrote: On Jun 3, 2011 6:59 AM, Tim Chown t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote: On 3 Jun 2011, at 14:38, Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org wrote: IPv6 only was the original plan of World IPv6 Day It was? No. I think there is confusion with ipv6 hour that happens at

Re: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol (Re: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day)

2011-06-03 Thread Owen DeLong
On Jun 3, 2011, at 7:31 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote: On 2011-Jun-03 16:13, Cameron Byrne wrote: On Jun 3, 2011 6:59 AM, Tim Chown t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote: On 3 Jun 2011, at 14:38, Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org wrote: IPv6 only was the original plan of World IPv6 Day It was? No. I