I've found pinging a polite email to the whois contact on the ASN -
sometimes- gives useful results, but not always.
Be aware that you're not only dealing with router black-holes, but
seemingly some people have applied bogon filtering to their BIND name
servers also.
If you can provide a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2009 8:01 AM, Shane Short wrote:
I've found pinging a polite email to the whois contact on the ASN
-sometimes- gives useful results, but not always.
Be aware that you're not only dealing with router black-holes, but
seemingly some
Hi Matthew,
I had the same problem with our new range assigned to us by APNIC, out
of 110/8
You're in for a long, hard and frustrating road.
If you manage to get in contact with anyone, or anyone responds to
you, mind letting me know? I'd suspect they'd probably have us blocked
still
The 109/8 range was removed from our ISP Ingress Prefix Filters in
version 22 (dated 6-Feb-2009):
ftp://ftp-eng.cisco.com/cons/isp/security/Ingress-Prefix-Filter-Template
s/T-ip-prefix-filter-ingress-loose-check-v22.txt
Thanks,
John
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Walster
On 09/10/2009 4:22, Matthew Walster matt...@walster.org wrote:
A customer of mine is reporting that there are a large number of addresses
he can not reach with his addresses in the 109/8 range. This was
declassified as a BOGON and assigned by IANA to RIPE in January 2009.
If you have a
5 matches
Mail list logo